X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
	:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=RHZK/GPozz5ZbcAQ8Hsccq59b1IPRDaVL8aHOr7hTfI=;
	b=kdw+NglbsVxsd1s2yjY4vrra3zT5uYX67GGni60WLkYHdczAC/DNYIu5rbrPQ+CAHO
	hl+wmBqf1uJpdo7xCoE7oVQ5gPUrdLEd0yb6HbC7qjwS4EiVWkkP8VGpcm8FdeMSnPKr
	PBg4yEGxQeQib9C1Iz87pSMkiB7qoTCgRdLLcV+I92Ur+xGdc+qFFw6MSIQ1hoVh8wgb
	5CaseNq8dCISCVnAXTK/dY7l3zNel5j+oKyhuy47XFDICHvHJ4nBZreLmskAULED20WS
	rfPnPJbj4mFtZCjjWxdnaYdsqkyTel4JfIduaf6inX0gcrT82KaaYU62oMR0mqUpX0n3
	6dag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=RHZK/GPozz5ZbcAQ8Hsccq59b1IPRDaVL8aHOr7hTfI=;
	b=kMM0SRlg8brQ77pTUrbJJdJvsP7nyrcb+/KvhgfrZ5S4Tx0PZP7aPWvy1YhUTk8Scr
	SkwPiIhWvfWYcx2iQjYJkUvuIvYZRKhsBRGlJoo+ocO7jcm01oDW3Z2jc6djuBmegQlR
	HkJMHD2Ol0tPIynJkPuu/lzaqyIHYjyE4boDU0aYyqzIxaOURrdkAFIL8fceO8F3Puhk
	S7MFAp8tWmMg0sISKE1hJghH5iAbZ2KKEzl/0VuJP6Fmj6olF85xLLFp1YoWIyPD9dsv
	hnmqRZAXMoVjO3mHr+QPASwIzCLGwMsKclpfKGLNNbRHtJgZ+Bk+R6hTsBKfjHvy9/Sw
	MJ/g==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMke39mlf++zrAzA1IalJDADVdeaU0QUg8n7h4WCBKOvgogmS4rpqv7xx1iHyqLqoF+MwA==
X-Received:	by 10.46.80.89 with SMTP id v25mr917243ljd.117.1486846683209;
	Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:58:00 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos
Message-ID:	<20170211205800.GB14489@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<D0E30DB4-3ADF-415C-A95E-B58F09AE054D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702111609100 DOT 25113 AT nimbus>
	<CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<0D03FED9-A309-4F6C-9863-0EC6DB35176D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20170211182330 DOT GO21523 AT foo DOT stuge DOT se>
	<FA6FF0F2-6850-4B55-A19F-A343CB8762A9 AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<FA6FF0F2-6850-4B55-A19F-A343CB8762A9@noqsi.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:56:39PM -0700, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> >> as far as I can tell, nobody else understands it well enough to
> >> write a back end, unlike gnetlist proper.
> > 
> > How do you think that could change?
> 
> Well, gnetlist had, from the beginning, multiple people contributing back ends. But for years, others have complained they couldn’t contribute because of Scheme. Where are they? Is this new thing actually any more comprehensible than gnetlist to non-schemers?

We won't win here, John. People who really contribute, still send
their patches directly to me or on launchpad. You can see activity
in mainline for the last half a year and come to a
conclusion. Sadly, but nobody of the devs who worked on geda-gaf
before want to continue there.

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -