X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	"Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: gEDA/gaf: want an advice
Message-ID:	<1af8aee7-f6c5-89f5-2298-b89788084ab3@peter-b.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:40:39 +0000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
	Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 2017-01-16, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:

> Just to inform you: I'm still working on geda-gaf, my current work
> is here:
>
>   https://github.com/vzh/geda-gaf/tree/unstable-1.9
 >
 > [snip]
 >
> Why do I write this here? Well, my work is xorn-incompatible so I
> had to remove xorn to keep the repository in consistent state. It
> is probably not fully gnetlist-API-compatible (well, we have no
> "official" gnetlist API so far). OTOH, I'm not optimistic any
> more, don't want to lead the project (as I wanted before), and
> don't want to work on geda-gaf alone (and some people leave
> because they don't know who is leading and where we are going).

I've joined in working on this branch [1], because I did several years 
of work on getting gEDA into a decent state and I'm pleased to see 
someone building on it.

I've added several performance improvements in libgeda, and fixed a 
whole load of stability bugs in gschem.

If you like using geda 1.8.2 and you want something that's fully 
backward-compatible and stable, I encourage you to try it out, and send 
feedback.

                                    Peter

[1] https://github.com/vzh/geda-gaf/pulls?q=is%3Apr%20author%3Apeter-b

-- 
Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>

- Raw text -