X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=lxLT4Ayf2r91TEyH39oTTtFsuksdc34aNv0Kr0vav9c=;
	b=ewmPEpPQBqCzAFhpOiI/KviuxoKsXpmd4YDkgE+uGnMEXKlkRb0Z6OzCT/FKUZKBZT
	1QiQdcZL22MXxZ6rAL8ePeQjP9iu+bpfB2rp3RQb3WoQ0lQfoP6HRgMk/+uSzOL5eiq4
	o1W/h6ecW1mlHX0nAwPwYS/mb6L9xBlT97FAGAF7QsL0up90oA+be9xJ75qbS1JVx6od
	f6b7dYhWRVV1X4QjZ1SjPozxVoxQVSLyRZAqVdTBXxmXG4L3dIFyR0nWVs9+JdIQxwCA
	31I9vMPMsVbZjX3Bt0kbi2KHvdM4lY44cZDTnqVgH8PXt5nLhto6p8fE/3Rsb16sYPC3
	sAzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=lxLT4Ayf2r91TEyH39oTTtFsuksdc34aNv0Kr0vav9c=;
	b=MmhB+f42Fg+uPZYiW+oR+ORXnV9M6B4TO04138vwOyIskQf/ylIzxdto8LoiYZEZB+
	IE0jBfwO5evtU5Kzzto+oPTVqwGPklSd8NRtpPYmkGtcyjOiWTKKvZNclDrydYTo3rfw
	HLWrYauhGmz8/x1vXcN6VI8vwmzqshGrp8bEyD9FQf6f8lYIP55EpoHtlRAUFhvbkYQR
	xB8veZxBl6OtNihbZoYVVKE5IeqsA0bqvIwfZBZdLl0wXtc5BRXKSBk6AJEb9WUsUjlT
	2xL/h5H2VBXpUXyNyIPT6wmMeRGMVAtIxukrHMMKHK7xuzceODgmON9jQZIYyyR32rXj
	UeMA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ABUngvcDJCBU1r8YayUUN6drE3cN+nXPiSqUnRvUSURD/YLfVPelPSFjBiyhz1A8aqXQtA==
X-Received:	by 10.25.152.130 with SMTP id a124mr5528634lfe.33.1477279142470;
	Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:18:59 +0300
From:	"(graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Annoying object selection behaviour in gschem >
	1.6.2
Message-ID:	<20161024061859.34eba7cc@gibi.dmn.ru>
In-Reply-To:	<CEAF12F0-D575-44B3-BE14-0C62A55EFBAB@qux.com>
References:	<1477080832 DOT 2909 DOT 106 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<201610212041 DOT u9LKfw5r031245 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1477089908 DOT 2909 DOT 123 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<s6nbmycyci8 DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<1477129015 DOT 2909 DOT 130 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<141F9C23-F141-42FE-A760-834BBDAA7C2F AT qux DOT com>
	<CAAKZVJnZFhwf1SJpiMirG3YGb6gwcRq0+x=kdf49fRpLmGh=Ew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<86CE0804-4DB5-402E-9D6A-CAC8C69BF910 AT qux DOT com>
	<CAAKZVJnrMwzVDieg_fOifNsmRrucUY_nN=Nk4L3676tKWUyPnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C1CE5556-977E-431C-B2B0-46A529940485 AT qux DOT com>
	<CEAF12F0-D575-44B3-BE14-0C62A55EFBAB AT qux DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:58:05 -0400
"Roger Williams (roger AT qux DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Unfortunately, the on_select code isn't quite the
> behaviour I would like to see, since it prevents you from
> selecting individual attributes for editing. This hook
> should only be applied to objects selected by a *window
> selection*, not by discrete mouse clicks. Any suggestion?

Hi Roger,

  If I understand correctly, by "window selection" you mean holding left mouse
button, then dragging - drawing a box around objects,
thus selecting them, right?
  Unfortunately, we cannot determine whether selection was
made by that "window selection" method or by clicking individual items, or by
some other means. So, at most, we can make the behaviour configurable, as in
the code example above: press F2, and you can select/edit single attribute;
press F1, and window selection will work as intended.

Dmitry.

- Raw text -