X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Segfault bug in PCB? - rather worse now...
In-Reply-To:	<1475933146.2937.19.camel@linetec>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1610081552180.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<1475747077 DOT 18232 DOT 10 DOT camel AT linetec> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610061954010 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <1475930373 DOT 2937 DOT 7 DOT camel AT linetec> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610081511030 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <1475933146 DOT 2937 DOT 19 DOT camel AT linetec>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schreef op za 08-10-2016 om 15:14 [+0200]:
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>> gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schreef op do 06-10-2016 om 19:54 [+0200]:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> There appears to be a little segfault problem in PCB version 1.99z,
>>>>> build Sep 13 2016 at 08:12:51, used on Linux Mint 17.3 KDE:
>>>>
>>>> Fixed in pcb-rnd svn HEAD.
>>              ^^^^^^^
>> Not sure if you mean pcb-rnd or mainline...
>>
>>> Erm, not to complain too much, but PCB now(*) exhibits a much worse
>>> segfault problem: the simple act of selecting (blue highlight) an
>>> element will immediately crash PCB upon undoing with the U key.
>>
>> If you mean rnd: I can not reproduce this in pcb-rnd - tried to select
>> elements and undo in all different ways I could think of and it worked. If
>> you can reproduce it with pcb-rnd, please ./configure with --debug and
>> send me a backtrace.
>>
>> (FYI, my fix differs from any of those proposed for mainline recently.)
>
> Hm, this is a bit confusing. From what you mention here, I probably use
> the mainline version: This morning, I pulled in a PCB update from the
> mehanik/unstable PPA, and from the build date (today's date), I assumed
> it was your fix. But apparently, that is not necessarily the case.
> How can I see what branch I'm using? Is 'pcb' the mainline, and
> 'pcb-rnd' the rnd branch?

Pcb-rnd is a fork. Take it as a totally separate project. Since pcb-rnd 
does not have branches, its name is simply pcb-rnd. I am a pcb-rnd 
developer, all my improvements and fixes go in pcb-rnd. In majority of the 
cases these fixes don't end up in mainline so it's very unprobable you 
get a new segfault in mainline after I make a modification in pcb-rnd.

Anything else called "pcb" on this list is a reference to one of the 
branches of mainline.

HTH,

Igor2

- Raw text -