X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<57D6EF18.3030201@xs4all.nl>
Date:	Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:08:24 +0200
From:	"Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] IPC-D-356 netlister for pcb
References:	<57C74166 DOT 20000 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAM2RGhRYtO_5DNYNWYOVk7UDDViWWUCA0r4=V07srqACEn8OiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <57C7BAD0 DOT 5050902 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20160901212039 DOT 2e1020af94dafd6b923baca8 AT gmail DOT com> <57D6E016 DOT 50106 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20160912193651 DOT 13a108160c912ccfbf7b62b2 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20160912193651.13a108160c912ccfbf7b62b2@gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I could give at try on the schematics I have and check if export function work on these. That's basicallyt the only thing I could do.
>
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:04:22 +0200
> "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"<geda-user AT delorie DOT com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>      
>>>> ...
>>>> Purpose:
>>>> The IPC-D-356 format was designed to define a standard netlist format by
>>>> which bare
>>>> board test information can be represented. In the simplest of forms,
>>>> this means it must be
>>>> able to store netlist information along with XY coordinates, and even
>>>> reference
>>>> designators and pin numbers (if they exist). I feel like ending this
>>>> article here before it
>>>> gets unmanageable, but then Pete Waddell wouldn’t be happy, so let’s
>>>> proceed. If all the
>>>> information that a test system would need to know to verify and test a
>>>> bare board could
>>>> be represented in a single file, it would bring consistency to the
>>>> testing world. IPC-D-
>>>> 356 does just that.
>>>>
>>>> Does it work?
>>>> Yes. You will find that virtually all the test equipment manufacturers
>>>> either support the
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> Then it sounds like a really good idea to implement it.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> IPC-D-356 format now, or are in the process of supporting it. Are there
>>>> problems with
>>>> it? Of course. Certain special pad types are not supported and additions
>>>> could be made
>>>> which would assist computer aided repair stations, but all in all it’s
>>>> pretty good.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>        
>> Hello list members,
>>
>> As a reminder on the netlist exporter which still lives in a topic
>> branch for now:
>>
>> http://git.geda-project.org/pcb/log/?h=home/bert/LP996319
>>
>> Are there any users interested in this feature, and are willing to spend
>> some time/effort to do a test run on this feature ?
>>
>> I like to have some positive feedback, or acknowledgement, before
>> merging this feature.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Bert Timmerman.
>>      
Hi Nicklas,

It's for pcb, so please test on a layout ;-)

Thanks and kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.

- Raw text -