X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 11 Sep 2016 04:39:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnet-spice-noqsi documentation
In-Reply-To:	<20160910203651.3e03a6ea@floyd.freeelectron.net>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1609110438100.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<8885DFA6-76D0-4A2B-B7BE-C1BD9AFFCDD3 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160906171850 DOT 760f1845663014bb2717461d AT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL077q5-yvxXZ8w4jQDzcqjjCkZuCcfw2Juzk1RLnp0mpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160910203651 DOT 3e03a6ea AT floyd DOT freeelectron DOT net>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, al davis wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:11:48 -0700
> "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still using
>> make in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with anything better after
>> all these years.
>
> Actually, "make" is pretty good.  There is really no need for a
> replacement.
>
> So look at how we do configuration ... autotools??  Yikes!
>
> I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still
> using autotools in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with
> anything better after all these years.

Or the fact that when you come up with something better, implement it, 
prove that it works in multiple project with a long list of obscure 
systems it's tested on people say it's bad because it's not autotools.

- Raw text -