delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
To: | "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
From: | "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | [geda-user] favorite methods for BOM part symbols part footprints |
Message-ID: | <3bcd08f4-a0e9-3d6b-fb58-5e9b48cdb276@ecosensory.com> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Sep 2016 05:46:15 -0500 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Icedove/45.2.0 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
When I choose a new part to use I usually make a rough list BOM first as a spreadsheet while comparing different parts for price and performance, part symbols next, and part footprints last. That is mostly because I start with pencil and paper, and maybe some schematic sections for simulation, (but with no purchasing details), before having a schematic. Else I might create heavy symbols with attribs first. What is your work flow? What is the smoothest time saving way?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |