delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/08/02/13:25:28

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on fly.srk.fer.hr
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=6.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:22:05 +0200
From: "Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Plans for gEDA/gaf
Message-ID: <20160802172205.GA2438@alpha2>
References: <20160723092248 DOT GF17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607231423480 DOT 2224 AT nimbus>
<20160724053502 DOT GM17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607271434200 DOT 1841 AT nimbus>
<9719FF2C-AC85-4824-89E9-447216E7FA65 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607301258260 DOT 1409 AT nimbus>
<939E39F7-B4DA-4B56-A640-C7E6E4ECF955 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
<f5b0d73a-6d4f-d0d6-c67e-d4dea979b974 AT ecosensory DOT com>
<20160802122208 DOT GA12372 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
<193dbc32-63cb-2643-b741-d6bfc6a268e2 AT ecosensory DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <193dbc32-63cb-2643-b741-d6bfc6a268e2@ecosensory.com>
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u72HOP91019794
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:13:27AM -0500, John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> ===============http://endl.ch/content/cxx2rust-pains-wrapping-c-rust-example-qt5===================
> Rust and QT seems a time pit:
> "Another heavily used feature in C++ is overloading. Apparently Rust doesn’t
> support functions overloading either. Yes, I know it’s intentional and no, I
> strongly disagree with all philosophical reasons that try to “justify” it.
> I’m developing software in C++ starting from 90’s and while I’ve seen some
> rare examples of poor functions overloading use - this is still “must have”
> feature for any non-trivial framework, both from convenience and learning
> perspectives.

Indeed, this is a big problem when interfacing Rust directly to C++ code
using function overloading.

-- 
Ivan Stankovic, pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr

"Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, 
learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019