X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1469842079; bh=OPNlGU1p9GAgfcR1sM+7F4WhpQNBaK3g/1pnw5yfyn4=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:From:Subject; b=R2SZM0xWbiJXFeGg0yxbPqEmDMy5Zewig5YuVGyIETQW4ZjpGAZlp2nNfQG5muG6BnQfjNtl4BiBnEKibKl+jvU7KF9FKxf4BEvUOA8DImKbupshONYHDMefJI7MyXbfMuTmvK3xRrE0+4aIsPpoAjYT7Hp2gzXwuQdFKfteci5p5WYeDU/b5aiO+PJ7JBpmMB3lvEY1pC9k/BPttL7fnl90lTTJWf+kfq28w1oRZN3FmQUfRX2DOyeXj3Kq6VVaox8FFakL/mJ8N/7D2C5zUpyk0dAkpJ4RZD1gl1IMUF4v5PfRBP/0Ihm8BBPhlvzoHFrfJWRnnR2dms6HOI2zqg==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	970798 DOT 36104 DOT bm AT smtp202 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	tEq6nOEVM1n6OupiLccQfRNwmsbSI_Bt_CZEyuXA4KTFbb9
	MLGwQ_UkB6jby0_6_lpFhssydg2vVtz5fyccLG7IT9ikteDSIua7r49DMscB
	SrvMmgLP693YmYuWqd8SMmJmi7TJIJDsdz06xpvt.foKxWMAUXYCIuf29_K2
	IcQ6BpC_t9bQz_XQjJyIxleziikTlbDwci7l8ODXUzck.Q.luBDxvy0ltyNB
	l3ycPnnz8JkepOJ7WCUJcc3.x5gjCmWqs0iNQDu7lgICm6uTjIMlXauo1okM
	KCdRlnC06q5gerdP8ZbPAtudLmLM9RC4kH0.AHj.q.bcj_MfZKh5tw2OqBan
	J7TUALp.oHCD8AgfXAfuMnBF._VkrpGO0AZclQ7ZC4jCFlLlShQ8SV5uq_ZY
	3MtMSNmL94xet9HHEaM0syvvRwcg2mk_87UMDjmv041cSYAEfc85a2v32hlO
	x1Th_8uDqmb2uPKz1W5CjQFSNOxBNVFIBWQmD5CGVAJVX6cXwwxxSDzZLMiw
	5ddLWNurNqACgkg.3NtPRjPofhFw__DuM1nMvtUppC6xnHj2FjXZZ_JmCD8R
	PJRo-
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
From:	"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (1.0)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [OT] ngspice integration in KiCad
Message-Id:	<9719FF2C-AC85-4824-89E9-447216E7FA65@sbcglobal.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:27:58 -0700
References:	<CANqhZFwC48g07MUY411a20C5oipkmmkzUimhz8OgvL2Thi-yDg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160722171754 DOT GB17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAM2RGhRjABmejtuSz1PbGFFF+EHhznGGTODoh0bu2y4FJM=Cbw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160723065723 DOT GC17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1607231009290 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20160723092248 DOT GF17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607231423480 DOT 2224 AT nimbus> <20160724053502 DOT GM17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607271434200 DOT 1841 AT nimbus>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1607271434200.1841@nimbus>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	iPad Mail (13F69)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6U1S4Br017075
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
> 
> Literally the only reason for not immediately removing Guile from gEDA is that this would break existing setups.  There is certainly no excuse for making gEDA more dependent on Guile.

What are your plans for the gEDA-gaf codebase? It looks like your are rewriting the core library in other languages. Is your plan to make libgeda obsolete?

Ed

- Raw text -