delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2016/07/28/17:32:50

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:30:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [OT] ngspice integration in KiCad
In-Reply-To: <20160724053502.GM17595@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1607271434200.1841@nimbus>
References: <CANqhZFwC48g07MUY411a20C5oipkmmkzUimhz8OgvL2Thi-yDg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160722171754 DOT GB17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAM2RGhRjABmejtuSz1PbGFFF+EHhznGGTODoh0bu2y4FJM=Cbw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160723065723 DOT GC17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1607231009290 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20160723092248 DOT GF17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607231423480 DOT 2224 AT nimbus> <20160724053502 DOT GM17595 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi Vladimir,

I took a few days off the mailing list and realized just how ridiculous 
this is.  Noone except hardcore Scheme fanboys is pretending that Scheme 
is even a thing any more.

The point you're trying to make (Scheme being to C what C is to assembler, 
etc.) was true at a time when there was nothing around like Python, Ruby, 
or Haskell.  In particular, the reasons you brought up for choosing Scheme 
over other languages are even more true for Haskell.  The reason not to 
use Haskell is also the same as for Scheme: users don't want to wrap their 
minds around some crazy programming language in order to get things done.

Literally the only reason for not immediately removing Guile from gEDA is 
that this would break existing setups.  There is certainly no excuse for 
making gEDA more dependent on Guile.

Your're desperately clinging to a dead horse.  Please don't blame others 
for not mounting with you.

Roland

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019