X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QYqzTmRUzJ/1aZ9P2A3DGfqvecq1sR0iTGYELE/iqz4=;
	b=pSDZL+PeuUmiqbs31PhsdT1vPuBzeROA3zMDDx6fJ1s6Dj8XRSw/J1KB9wKRjjwN59
	WsjFSkRFv/0SBAOzQqI8AOqPka3CFUWU26ZArLRrLNd/4+J+GxcV8f4KSFjk9/9K+rlt
	pTHAW63FsMib+AR1GQ6pp+g5vwobpKCP/GbmARtolPWbee5soMRxIyYzWkKKBtaRDpEp
	hs75Y9+qOC8ufAilepghxORyuRb0qCxFTCMTEbk2o/sU4/RwXqv/bKcfXnkpBzFGLIO1
	vLeD+BE6pGiR2LU9JdEV8cBOcejwB0mFkFydyatjJTl9jhD/RNO7N0qBlBDm2+iRbukL
	BvmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QYqzTmRUzJ/1aZ9P2A3DGfqvecq1sR0iTGYELE/iqz4=;
	b=RVi9zAWOQ+mkYjpsVrpN5O0U1QIOnudhK8hdlflj3QhQ8Ohvq6W5IIf7W3dDr5dm16
	Pawq0u3RejFwidw8Z7K6aPbW01wG//oFxg1Mck147WmNRA1HABXexQuTmBMEPJStqvtr
	vnY4eyA4YEKdj1Pwjevz2ZuAM0DRAPqV9bFMIrjW26Dk0MvpZ9sih9nREoOAZR1Tsxgg
	F1N49fuhp84cas1/TYWdutHddwgWSCQ7YLeVVMwIsm4VNTpGO7zw9fG2M/48EG7Os68R
	2excX/cyYg8/egz62lyJ5EYqNEPhZ6pfsieDXAXxx5g+SKHmQLddR0Y+LBFGnJRz0IEf
	y9rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AEkooutLpoqhbWpy49OFygcXmNII6kI9SS+ZbOrpj4cfaeRDKTBgswsLvRcKk5M5GBYIxQ==
X-Received:	by 10.28.130.208 with SMTP id e199mr22918510wmd.14.1469476352719;
	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:52:27 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? --> pcb limitations
Message-Id:	<20160725215227.749e6b7d5413325b556e89eb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<258b7bd1-2868-a900-eef5-776bf4419970@s5tehnika.net>
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<481e79b9-15d6-965e-8f14-4705b20df550 AT s5tehnika DOT net>
	<20160725200248 DOT 6d58c3c01b14b4863f9f8680 AT gmail DOT com>
	<258b7bd1-2868-a900-eef5-776bf4419970 AT s5tehnika DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > gschem work pretty well, no problem to draw any circuit I want.
> 
> Gschem has its warts, but its quite a lot nicer than PCB, I agree. 
> Still, there is much to be done even with gschem.

I say warts are mostly workflow related.

> I ve never really felt the need to inser graphics into PCB although as 
> it is now, it can be quite limiting. Arbitrary arcs would be nice, 
> elipses and elliptic arcs, beziers too etc.

Not graphics but to draw any shape in any context like all the ordinary drawing primitives within pins. Possibility to define a pin type which could be used for all pins in a particular package type for example LQFP would be very useful.

> But some features are awesome. Coleague of mine was left flabergasted 
> when he saw how easily did I combine several PCBs onto a panel without 
> any extra tools before sending it to manufacturing, for example.

Yes ordinary copy and paste is simple and powerful. There is however a selection problem which could be solved by adding a "sub layout" attribute to objects then for example all objects including traces belonging to a power supply could be selected and moved.


Regards Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -