X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=s5tehnika.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
	In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:
	Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
	Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=iqu07GFDl/LWsfhLJjfgVKGDxqhplCzpU4tvfoqNbWQ=; b=P5BpfSONKqQEKrKfXyZfXtEaBR
	XR7txt5oh13EeVZnFnxDq1sqSY2wsMx/JO4BKaxUZGRI3xf3YAYzO27Y5e1zpJZgwtGfWnBniMMSK
	5v1DejDFt+Lxvr1+kIUA06jTheHZzetqqvQTZ5p+eXZM8O1Alb27I8E7br2l+0O76m/KpIgB2DXgu
	RzLqZnEUkn8xZjfPmmjjQiLYQh45rYbF/8Azib2zFuIyd6SPe+4fGLi8/oto12YmLr5Edgz0QPhn2
	mOu2wWdPmMCN1QO5Y+aym+xG8gVLHHb98GBsD5fFOlTPA4Z66iDRhjVx6KzqiYJdjU3Omf1p5uXFx
	LuiDQ/uw==;
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stay or go?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<481e79b9-15d6-965e-8f14-4705b20df550 AT s5tehnika DOT net>
	<20160725200248 DOT 6d58c3c01b14b4863f9f8680 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	"Brane2 (brane2 AT s5tehnika DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<258b7bd1-2868-a900-eef5-776bf4419970@s5tehnika.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:33:45 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20160725200248.6d58c3c01b14b4863f9f8680@gmail.com>
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - server.studiofaca.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - s5tehnika.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via:	server.studiofaca.com: authenticated_id: brane2 AT s5tehnika DOT net
X-Authenticated-Sender:	server.studiofaca.com: brane2 AT s5tehnika DOT net
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 25. 07. 2016 20:02, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) 
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>> So we looked into all known choices and at the time, came to the
>> conclusion that gEDA+PCB were, sucky as the were, only choices worth
>> mentioning.
> gschem work pretty well, no problem to draw any circuit I want.

Gschem has its warts, but its quite a lot nicer than PCB, I agree. 
Still, there is much to be done even with gschem.

> Yes pcb is simple although most common tasks are not that hard, basically draw graphics on layers. pcb have limitations in the possibility to draw graphics and lack individual clearance values.
>
You can set individual clearance values by selecting tracks,vias etc and 
using changleclearsize in command window. It even gives you function 
list and parameter blueprints.

I ve never really felt the need to inser graphics into PCB although as 
it is now, it can be quite limiting. Arbitrary arcs would be nice, 
elipses and elliptic arcs, beziers too etc.

But there are far more pressing needs, like good custom polygone fill 
with island controll, netlist control with polygons on board etc etc.

But some features are awesome. Coleague of mine was left flabergasted 
when he saw how easily did I combine several PCBs onto a panel without 
any extra tools before sending it to manufacturing, for example.

- Raw text -