X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=PqIqqWrwISO70mUc3Fa0lBJi8fglXPJxy+1/Ehyxzls=;
	b=COy3WIRBXM+boyY5xD8rX9F/x46yjsHpjCSolSnj/C6A45ACPe5EIMMYgAk5yO6UPU
	fSfTO8zZxX/X8Y7ONrE2ZDn7+ZNV3aCS82zuLWsPaNuZvjODhiKMs74GpNLA9R9b9abW
	dkgUVqx5ouENEm3ygPJLtbPdk4t3S2amjX9iTRND2u/GviIy0EdnkllmajhvGxlBvaPQ
	zGhwDc3yglbMl6TBBD5U6jopcsLpNQSrL9u1yLFXE7KOpwGJ9qtl1EVmhJBUNd2/iFPf
	+wgMeTyYrZ+XHaiUajFsSgEkdqMCZ4kuuPuI6F3v4y9MmBn6XVghNqm1m4z91flzzPBW
	t7tA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=PqIqqWrwISO70mUc3Fa0lBJi8fglXPJxy+1/Ehyxzls=;
	b=YqE6pzTjW3tDzRzJxSn6KeSLgwTzhBp4bQ4PXBbfQEY33SwgrZTZcXzBsFIG1YH9pU
	MdHVYAOxD0/f8eSztSVGt4reTtgy9ynG7THy5fzrtmQ3jLW0GEnRcnpcenYywEVnwadp
	+ESRjDkRi061P3uz9FCVLnKcRAA4Dk5E8c8SKT5/Lb4UgwLl9chKj6BgLXIWiu7wA1Rq
	lFyCFeakLhy4h74dZQzJB7j2/ReWGbwS4ayAcdEonN/Zm5lJVIFvxoVPsJUkv05gUv7z
	SIauuotxb5myXeqbakm81SqMr5rRRdTcf8CS9uSfgi0a4oSgb9wxgmFkSspM0ziUKs42
	JMwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AEkooutIxjTxVIif0X6Hvgi8VnCUdERHo+mQudw9y8msaHbFRZQMoqUJ3qe6VzuIbDvt8w==
X-Received:	by 10.25.169.147 with SMTP id s141mr5116451lfe.203.1469335205895;
	Sat, 23 Jul 2016 21:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 24 Jul 2016 07:40:03 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stay or go?
Message-ID:	<20160724044003.GL17595@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<57938EAB DOT 3020106 AT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<57938EAB.3020106@xs4all.nl>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> John Doty is right in that gschem will not lock you into pcb.
> 
> gschem and gnetlist do give *you* the choice where to go for *your* next
> step in the workflow *you* want to follow.
> 
> pcb is just one possible further step, and osmond, verilog, vhdl (ghdl),
> gnucap or ngspice are other possible steps (see "man gnetlist").

While I agree with you here, there is another side of the
coin. There are netlister's backends nobody uses and nobody
reports their state. A few months ago one user has reported vams
is broken. Looking at it I've discovered it is broken about a
decade ago. No special tests were made at the time of its creation
so just nobody knows...

I am saying about this because my intention, which I am going to
implement, is stripping our repository by removing various
obsolete/unused/non-working thigs. Of course, I'll ask our users
here about any of them, if/when I do this.

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -