X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
Cc:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Parameter substitution
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<s6na8h89ydi DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607231941050 DOT 16188 AT nimbus>
	<s6n8tws1428 DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1607232257250 DOT 1800 AT nimbus>
	<s6npoq4x9bx DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<EA4BA0F4-6B70-4C17-B801-2BE99AB48AE8 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jul 2016 01:47:01 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<EA4BA0F4-6B70-4C17-B801-2BE99AB48AE8@noqsi.com> (John Doty's
	message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:07:54 -0600")
Message-ID:	<s6nmvl7x6h6.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6NNlOtp006326
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> writes:

> On Jul 23, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Stephan Böttcher <geda AT psjt DOT org> wrote:
>
>>> - Pins for subschematic symbols don't require a pinnumber= attribute,
>>> and non-slotted pins don't require a pinseq= attribute.
>> 
>> Have they ever required those?
>
> If you turn off hierarchy expansion gnetlist needs pin numbers, since
> connectivity is identified by (refdes pinnumber).

Ok, sure, in that case they have netlist semantics attached.

And now I remember your problem with the substitution patch.  When
hierarchy is not expanded, there will be nowhere to apply the
substitutions.  Your spice netlister would need to transform the
substitutions into instance parameters.  Is that difficult?

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -