delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1469290656; bh=1EgoNCK4QbEERO1vWvoT9QxLVDaRW8VVvEyWuyhKktg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Y2Kk2mxXNixkzN4KN1F7ufodJcDzXbKjvOMdH6KJI0YkKtx7PabCIWPd2sTdOWIjIPO9K/6K5BeFGIAgHaXvLZWzd+u38DoC3oUSK1KrJfkOehpXc0quneOSIUJvkYKxjnESKxhQBk08S2MFzvl/A38O7g0lO61nd16PWhQCgjvThRNYuS86Qj28QHCLqDHlf8jVbaCZ5LwGmhOzywZ+yibilFI5hWhM7Qwe2z5W1P4ts4+gpGDnN6Q3MWRNPjMpfGim4qOTK+H0jHvo7XxUtH6541Nr+pv9PUF5tQukHkhRBfasyWuhB51EQXFmiFeDn2T7LJtfezCSGJYjqhhMUA== |
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: | 618369 DOT 32493 DOT bm AT smtp120 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com |
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: | ymail-3 |
X-YMail-OSG: | cFR1fdkVM1m3ykzUoO7Nq30HI3kOJ4yR.igkzD4FYiZaYz1 |
lgQOW3F_EmUVsOvAC3KS7cFBzqF0Q.pDm3k4KLmObhe_XBR4oZxzoVncOmKJ | |
3xdlzKaCoHlpb1IuEp640Sd3sU7pCNmOD.c9bE6O2imTps_J9Lw3l64DGa4h | |
SxTeAi4rYGJru2C5H06Bm1VqZ7c5rFQZswKfT0td_VTWOza6mU5hjxDqbESL | |
5csuFO1jGYkr4ynvhEbsKnjN3Pjp7Q6JDx1LHzlGuS44cKIeBh1VLXXwagWY | |
sz_S1zeguLOYzBlYHAKIa.DtFVgV3Iy2RYnNR8t_CCBloEVF1r00C6Fcx8dC | |
P5GJLrkywxrBhVkkKmHej7LoCaIKmL69pMzBtZ0.ynayIAvDWRC8rJmsMENG | |
np6nN0sRrFntC0BQykmLXeH1B0mUrqxafaof0tWES3risGHMO2kyYzQ.TISN | |
s.eVrbeqDSP08Uq5Ma.2kdzfYuIjr2lGv71U0VQDloeONdQh5Z4Xl7UZl6Qu | |
xfAA1YCv65i_yEC9S5swD7OyZ1ULiUtdc2jqIRCOM8ZvKhKPZBFOi0sBmUPv | |
arcQ- | |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA-- |
From: | "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Message-Id: | <BCA31465-6EDA-4181-A476-07F86D96057C@sbcglobal.net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2016 09:17:34 -0700 |
References: | <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> <F2516359-5349-4052-A56E-9452DBCC7BD6 AT noqsi DOT com> |
To: | "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <F2516359-5349-4052-A56E-9452DBCC7BD6@noqsi.com> |
X-Mailer: | Apple Mail (2.3124) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > On Jul 23, 2016, at 7:41 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: >=20 >> It makes me wonder how long gschem/pcb will endure. >=20 > You=92re asking the wrong question. Gschem does not lock you into pcb. = If you=92re making printed circuit boards, I recommend a gschem->Osmond = PCB flow. I=92ve exported gschem designs to many layout people, and the = one who uses Osmond is by far the fastest and produces the best work. = The others spend way more time, and sniff that Osmond is a tool for = hobbyists, too simple for a true professional. Go figure. Additionally, the gschem->PADS workflow has been painless for me. It=92s = nice that gschem doesn=92t have vendor-lock-in on any particular = workflow. Ed --Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html = charset=3Dwindows-1252"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; = -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" = class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div = class=3D"">On Jul 23, 2016, at 7:41 AM, John Doty <<a = href=3D"mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com" class=3D"">jpd AT noqsi DOT com</a>> = wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div = class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; = font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; = font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: = start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; = widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" = class=3D"">It makes me wonder how long gschem/pcb will endure.<br = class=3D""></blockquote><br style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: = 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: = normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; = text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: = auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=3D""><span= style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; = font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; = orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: = none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline = !important;" class=3D"">You=92re asking the wrong question. Gschem does = not lock you into pcb. If you=92re making printed circuit boards, I = recommend a gschem->Osmond PCB flow. I=92ve exported gschem designs = to many layout people, and the one who uses Osmond is by far the fastest = and produces the best work. The others spend way more time, and sniff = that Osmond is a tool for hobbyists, too simple for a true professional. = Go figure.</span></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""><div = class=3D"">Additionally, the gschem->PADS workflow has been painless = for me. It=92s nice that gschem doesn=92t have vendor-lock-in on any = particular workflow.</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div = class=3D"">Ed</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail=_3D3258E5-6CC5-484F-9336-767A870AE2A3--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |