delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Virus-Scanned: | amavisd-new at neurotica.com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; |
s=default; t=1469289209; | |
bh=+LronxSETtB7JhpFsta1BDfu6VdhtXv54OFtu9vfKm4=; | |
h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; | |
b=fQvO8Al2iMWmQbJ+aviccV9WdrJ0nkjYQr+xlmOVYM8OMvNXorm+GjRHtBQybizSr | |
QO2e8Iud8ptov5KlnpZqATfqhLQgN6MMAQBmpdymxcwKP30W3UQRMJDRdP1gk51A/7 | |
56zG1WUQwuy4E8emAZ3WzkfCIFlrtdzM1P3kg8gg= | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> |
From: | "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <f1a80c17-5aec-9d4b-81cb-d5a89812e842@neurotica.com> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:53:28 -0400 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/45.2.0 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF@wellesley.edu> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6NFrZ2s006561 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 07/23/2016 10:16 AM, James Battat (jbattat AT wellesley DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I’ve used gschem/pcb for several (modest) boards now, and love many things about it. > I do not love what I perceive to be deep friction and lack of cooperation among developers. > > It makes me wonder how long gschem/pcb will endure. And therefore I must decide if, as a user, I should invest any more effort to learning the platform and building up custom footprint/schematic libraries, etc, or instead transition now to another platform. > > This may be an unfair question to ask on this forum, but here goes: > > What do you see as drawbacks to KiCad (wrt gschem/pcb)? I’m on the fence about transitioning away from gschem/pcb. Why should I stay? One big drawback to KiCad that I ran into a little less than a year ago is that it's very difficult to get running if you're using a Linux installation more than, say, a month old. I'm not one of those guys who reinstalls my OS at the drop of a hat (I come from the commercial UNIX world, not the Windows world) so that just doesn't work for me. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |