X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb-rnd: no more routing style max (dynamic
	vector)
In-Reply-To:	<20160623121027.01be400b@jive>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1606231234370.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1606230652530 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20160623121027 DOT 01be400b AT jive>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> Content preview:  Yay! Thanks! You are the man! Hope I see this in mainline
>   PCB. What I'd like to see too, is to combine the DRC rules and the design
>   rules in one place. [...]
>
> Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
>
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>  0.0 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1    No description available.
>  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
>                             (leventelist[at]gmail.com)
>  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
>                             CUSTOM_MED
>  1.7 MIME_BASE64_TEXT       RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding
>  0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED    ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
> X-Scan-Signature: b930d4211d727e78d0aa51c72cb842fc
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id u5NAAaQi010705
>
> Yay! Thanks! You are the man!
>
> Hope I see this in mainline PCB.
>
> What I'd like to see too, is to combine the DRC rules and the design rules in
> one place.

I have a long term programmable drc plan. I will post an item with a short 
description in the feature poll later on. Once I get to start working 
on cschem, I will surely need to implement the programmable drc too, 
because that seems to be the most flexible way to delegate arbitrary tasks 
to the netlister instead of hardwiring more special cases in the C code.

- Raw text -