X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=OMMg2PgKGo4uE1LCCg6OZkKkAsPNM6485DYFnDZs4r4=;
	b=F3yCuA37tVZ92TWVpVPTcXdcZJmapxVKzyjTc+G5p3WPg/cygZ/RwvZ5muiVtx6KOr
	aWmNBKSiyWP6Pko7MJXc3p7YT/NTr1tSmYUxo+UtslAHzFUQkbYVbA1JCUXBhD1pRPiO
	/1XURMzSdk9cyiU6t7+NOsow6d900CpdGrJg2LEQrQjQO0qQ4j8DPqupkm/AZfPNf8nW
	x5woc/x2Rw440WeS981g9XB5ZcDCFPh757R5rxtmdhXKZ/SrxGKTuTlja3qY/cNPITu9
	PXgisPEEb1y1YWXn35I7R0y9uyadcWLOervLt4tiR0brtIp/FHzLj4qiPsDdqVXYKyKv
	1eKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=OMMg2PgKGo4uE1LCCg6OZkKkAsPNM6485DYFnDZs4r4=;
	b=LVwsfxBwm3voHTkfqHSNfScGiwDh0nj4WSMy7i5Gi6PgfgvWxWWucLgVJboL9dv4D5
	gUpTyZGahPehKoyfIuwPVqQ2aivf+NWjQOpaweOIEa1rYTYWEhbXRJeNa8SF5lpdMvYk
	wwb+U1bDPWw9DXmz/KW5NtjfUOwXTAtZB+RdEFtiEggte9uBwrWVG07BbkveDZ4dAZDO
	SAsYjegi4Cf/UouSnNmKTnYkaNwOpzAhLky/5cu978fwn+kUU6WT86pRMABguVtC3ZSn
	PR9rf7AtK6KgUQkXfE9MlKEEjSR3HWbo/YrcI8ajXX0+Qxukjwcouk3c0l8gZU3C+uDd
	jkRg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FWA8/qJdsXfWcP7ra9l/xMYVN2DJ1BDwmJt+HDG7SwuVimqpIMXHpHQmTbb+cg5Cw==
X-Received:	by 10.28.14.73 with SMTP id 70mr8998886wmo.15.1463243101273;
	Sat, 14 May 2016 09:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2016 18:24:59 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances (C++)
Message-Id:	<20160514182459.ea2e9ad5563f9444529239ac@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201605141432.u4EEWZ9s018507@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<154a7fb8d8c-2a04-17506 AT webprd-a31 DOT mail DOT aol DOT com>
	<20160513081037 DOT GA23474 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<5735ACC6 DOT 30105 AT iee DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1605140519090 DOT 28818 AT igor2priv>
	<20160514094703 DOT fc95ba64dab2c53b068f260c AT gmail DOT com>
	<201605141432 DOT u4EEWZ9s018507 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Main advantage of object oriented programming is function
> > overloading and private variables in structures but excess amount of
> > features stuffed in C++ is really a problem. I think C++ does not
> > handle polymorphism well.
> 
> The whole point of C++ is to handle polymorphism well, and it does.
> For programs like gschem and pcb, which have lots of object types that
> are "similar but different", an object oriented language like C++
> should be an obvious choice.

If I remember correctly there some differences in C++ inheritance that make it less useful. It is useful with for example a virtual function to extract drawing primitives in the super class which are implemented for each sub class.

> Unfortunately, C++ is a huge toolbox and people think you have to use
> every tool for every application, ...

I stay happy with those needed.

> > C/C++ lack good type checking which is a real disadvantage.
> 
> Well, C maybe, C++ has great support for type checking.  You just have
> to write type-specific code.

C does not distinguish different enumeration types does C++ do?


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -