X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2016 10:32:35 -0400
Message-Id:	<201605141432.u4EEWZ9s018507@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20160514094703.fc95ba64dab2c53b068f260c@gmail.com>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances (C++)
References:	<154a7fb8d8c-2a04-17506 AT webprd-a31 DOT mail DOT aol DOT com>
	<20160513081037 DOT GA23474 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<5735ACC6 DOT 30105 AT iee DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1605140519090 DOT 28818 AT igor2priv> <20160514094703 DOT fc95ba64dab2c53b068f260c AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Main advantage of object oriented programming is function
> overloading and private variables in structures but excess amount of
> features stuffed in C++ is really a problem. I think C++ does not
> handle polymorphism well.

The whole point of C++ is to handle polymorphism well, and it does.
For programs like gschem and pcb, which have lots of object types that
are "similar but different", an object oriented language like C++
should be an obvious choice.

Unfortunately, C++ is a huge toolbox and people think you have to use
every tool for every application, which leads to messy code.  Please
don't assume that's the case, or that C++ code is going to be harder
to understand than C.

> C/C++ lack good type checking which is a real disadvantage.

Well, C maybe, C++ has great support for type checking.  You just have
to write type-specific code.

- Raw text -