X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on fly.srk.fer.hr
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=6.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 20:26:44 +0200
From:	"Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	"M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances
Message-ID:	<20160513182644.GB6700@alpha2>
References:	<154a7fb8d8c-2a04-17506 AT webprd-a31 DOT mail DOT aol DOT com>
	<20160513081037 DOT GA23474 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<5735ACC6 DOT 30105 AT iee DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5735ACC6.30105@iee.org>
X-Operating-System:	GNU/Linux
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +0100, M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> The argument of switching to C to c++ barely exists .. the languages are
> comparable, with the added benefit of more features in C++ than pure C.
> I would also suspect there is still active development of the c++
> language, so that provides a good future-proof pathway.

My opinion is that modern C++ is simply not worth the effort.  The
cost/benefit ratio is enormous compared to, say, Rust.

-- 
Ivan Stankovic, pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr

"Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, 
learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"

- Raw text -