X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=kNujRRLbtZhUSSVIDy77QYlWitjErGaMLLrW69onXHQ=;
	b=bXXg+0kWoakk2cLxx4QM5JpaZnD3NFPV4gFGz0XqPAnyeK6QsvjHYDtPd5Xs87oscI
	6fWqT+VrqGdvSLBzwVLbadn63UVdiKAVGe1PoKY49djuBd1qiOsHLZiZ/kcIBLjjupZB
	WUdN/PVYnsZhElKoKA1KCLeaOi/t7jTrpUDOaEBzBTFspuHypxQa200buluIEeWPK3Hw
	RISZS2xmSqwtAyNBFkAF2ALQDzWx8MfG/AUqegP+vRhnaLrIlU5G9GpZ9ilQroSazwhv
	tN0J2goGc316L2R8RLSfHSb69fb0jO3IOxmU7MrA4/o3NxLbfLc6UJHC48m8SXHKCKqB
	zAqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=kNujRRLbtZhUSSVIDy77QYlWitjErGaMLLrW69onXHQ=;
	b=exypyRpQhmLR96PmwfTFFk0w7Si86DWjlz6MMk9amx7926vCOJo7dtNvB0YcBpnQvd
	PD1+8hms98DuVvX+Wp6SQvoNES7eLNY+GBYX0RPzEc/Ld3sKHM9k7J85LQui7EsguyXj
	xZHqsGnuiyPFnpR81flPLBbM3Rc8AhC9c/eNTWGiPVw/vqxLCzLMMpeSnVxWQeGw4Pr8
	G0g+wyYpU4UJTib4yg3knDf5UvNJzhrZbx3CjMc7v8yIjB5mDDXajEhvYTrSCHwfTrSb
	QEmAYKnFdg9DZRy5UeQ0BQixcUqtRWZ7oPhEOZMqTTUSF3zOiQS6og8ZDVC2lR+MKlI2
	quQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FWTiprgwqh3BdEo/xt/LxeIZHtyCe8M7FWqiwUMxeqFRhSMwDMDyQMxwGIdclnLUA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.222.8 with SMTP id v8mr5506085wmg.83.1463085533013;
	Thu, 12 May 2016 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 22:38:46 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyance --> file format, same old
	stuff
Message-Id:	<20160512223846.dc47e64dd84b180307ca0c54@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<5734E619.701@iee.org>
References:	<20160505205109 DOT 2fa7b189f4210b3c0d7a8a4b AT gmail DOT com>
	<57320DDA DOT 4050107 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20160510191203 DOT d5dccf7d7353d0a550b97a1e AT gmail DOT com>
	<57322CA3 DOT 3010808 AT gmail DOT com>
	<915F1EED-B30B-43AF-ABB0-949F0A754918 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<7BAA31F3-9E00-4372-AB4A-7739D3FD2AA0 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q99ToQ0rB6CKCLqt3zSMtFWnxgxLppCW6c7hyeQ3cm2GA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E94B7DD6-F189-4781-8914-D0290BBEA1A5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160512165522 DOT GA1106 AT alpha2>
	<CAC4O8c9reDFThFxGURJSLZisgs0UOzXBwwOSqQFq86oK3qcwXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160512190533 DOT GA1161 AT alpha2>
	<5734E619 DOT 701 AT iee DOT org>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Whilst the human-readable files/formats have their merits, and the
> ability to 'hack' the saved files around with text tools is pretty
> wonderful, ...

Text files also work with diff then stored in a revision control system.

> I don't necessarily believe sql or a database back-end really offers any
> advantages over text flat-file .. its rather using a sledgehammer to
> crack a nut.

You might be right with the sledge hammer, I often write embedded application there a lot of things done dynamically is done much simpler statically at or before compile time.

The needed operations on the data will tell if sql is a good option.

- Raw text -