X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=x78cwWo4KVU1pPJdsDdlm0qF2mi4DhokHvKrMu/Q54A=;
	b=kw3JRKfd5hacqUB1ryTNN5TS40CqEO+8FFOizx61nTTfSdConckQp7Kkral14NtISi
	+Csys71OaFZ/S1JUxblMmggZfsmvWATsPOwTZTJEJNpd46nH/IpwUvKoyjzn6PYNtMeY
	evtA2WC8Rq+9Vcfnv7kZD8hxpaRoFm53Gayy8PUjILrjDrHh+H9VK2BALGUsxG8+5atf
	gnmfyLAs261ZyW4sMb5vUuIyvK0J08V4N2gza3LH93Hl13VdzFPARtPJ+i/9PUupwNuQ
	DURr9hwFHdsDgY0TNSZDkkCLJ6/+J6lDCEvzNUqtQRPiwLAZoky5JAZ+ey3KuCSoN1/l
	n1fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=x78cwWo4KVU1pPJdsDdlm0qF2mi4DhokHvKrMu/Q54A=;
	b=I/sVUdDuDralcY3v9Cr7vRubINA+CddILu72oPImYPaLR7NQbwJkLLc30TisEIoBrO
	WJYW0+VFfboo37yZxLgGVVTOMV3iRT4rc+jDyEeGjHoWapy/PDrRQ54Kya3HS53LWyqZ
	CQum7YnoOlQeoCPkUH1ATqRZvb5zCweU3FqWuwUCSxs7ZjRM69toCoJdWZmqiPu2Gw/R
	gyzTXu450efBIGi6G9szEuSvW9vS8B8BGDvKWiLMq7L8jHefIlLdr896R4oYYKblIBGX
	VYv9T0SKWdjud+osBuSTnQe5hQWKvD1FTtGBhEjZziH+O7eNZ0yYMxUPkhfrrgfcP3Bb
	QPeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FWU261S3GLztD42FxPyUOKerZs+Qt4TJKG2GKH5n9gKUB7BfNaDLaNf4JeYmJ+Iwg==
X-Received:	by 10.194.119.195 with SMTP id kw3mr40235343wjb.166.1462906027138;
	Tue, 10 May 2016 11:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<57322CA3.3010808@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 19:46:59 +0100
From:	"Iain Paton (selsinork AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances
References:	<572622FE DOT 9050705 AT gmail DOT com> <57279961 DOT 9010802 AT gmail DOT com> <20160505205109 DOT 2fa7b189f4210b3c0d7a8a4b AT gmail DOT com> <57320DDA DOT 4050107 AT gmail DOT com> <20160510191203 DOT d5dccf7d7353d0a550b97a1e AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20160510191203.d5dccf7d7353d0a550b97a1e@gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 2016-05-10 18:12, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> It should probably only be visible only then used but even though I seldom use it provide very useful functionality then needed.

not saying it doesn't, I'm just not at all convinced what it does
provide is worth sacrificing approximately a million pixels (~25%) on my
particular display, especially when probably 70-80% of the bars are
unused blank space.

With '4K' 3840x2160 displays starting to become common and ridiculously
cheap now, and 5K 5120x2880 becoming available it's not something that's
going away. Those will suffer even more from unused wasted space on the
two bars than I do.

I have a friend who uses photoshop across two monitors, the image being
edited is full screen on one monitor and all the menus, toolbars and
sidebar equivalents are on a second monitor.  That sort of flexibility
would be wonderful, but is only possible if the sidebar is detachable.

- Raw text -