X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=cvgZIpnGmNAhE12iXoIRjmVu4PQB1MNyQGbize0SB2A=;
	b=MKN3wBM0npMWxvsgquf2ytydEwWDlmZnwmg63iYSXTDT5cBkZ5rCdKxXYa1DaPwO49
	KoBHYc0rKWWURT/B1f39GURJQ4KKK+HZgaW63dYv/q9WyBgsli2IzPTUagupnXRalSEl
	dliyEIIG6bgtCpP0C7WWOuUkLbU9ViXMAlJ3qWsgEz1Wvs+BkAu9CsHWkjAxEtIBQdw+
	B62eqrOdc6snq7CCcXnEIBz1j4j9F6bn3uM51Ky8zWL0xxhUEymhQxzXxGJVIl689qUt
	Wp/g3OctHESXcVLawB4X1rMjrXvTVdm1d3uhBsuIZUfQrJYR9tGNzYGNgeMGgm3yvx4J
	PnSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=cvgZIpnGmNAhE12iXoIRjmVu4PQB1MNyQGbize0SB2A=;
	b=fIXwfTrn8jbNtXGdboivM2/s9IyxHT66iXPkS6XpeNglI5yPvTNreHL/73IEOWaKr6
	Dowo20ZnQylu5Zo/bP5KXbr8/eADFvhW4gEMDgibxI3AsPYcPHZRcGt9jlwVCOAc3sON
	IZ916anIZ4hCIej/2cOyjRrLe9wB1uE9Wsq0YQN5PhUnhdardMwYNMpX4KtWN3q+tIg1
	35NTpcWMDaUBebI6dWxp3qVfzLfT2gEyUbBqKCDxxHMgstDqF4jsfHiumblFFQ6Nzrbz
	9Y/fhA83um0N0DM/661oPFO4uB88J5hHTvoZxRL6Am7f58WTKZrSiscOJPqviBUcVrIX
	VphQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AD7BkJKxwL7WBGRDMdtKc4uYFd6a/EET2qQ2LQ+rlwCbtDsBn/3Gfrk/VtEsqvkF/WWRqQ==
X-Received:	by 10.112.50.144 with SMTP id c16mr5082403lbo.128.1457803999892;
	Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:33:14 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnetlist shorting wires
Message-Id:	<20160312183314.22800431e9b38bc211cac66f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<C6F55A3E-471A-47FA-8C15-A05B484761F2@noqsi.com>
References:	<20160312145647 DOT Horde DOT toH7mUmRASGNT3axa-gppQG AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<EE0E9851-80F4-4257-A9F6-30F0273A03A8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160312175302 DOT Horde DOT Ll10lTUHG4l7e2SKVPAGJE4 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<C6F55A3E-471A-47FA-8C15-A05B484761F2 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > What you've seen is the lowest level of a multi-level hiearchical design. Toplevel has sub-schematics which are instantiated many-times and contains sub-schematics itself..
> 
> Ok. One problem is that you’re not using the right IO symbols for hierarchy. You should be using in-1 or out-1, matching refdes of the symbol to the corresponding pinlabel of the symbol that represents your subcircuit. Here’s a working bottom-level schematic and the symbol that instantiates it:
> 

It must be exactly this IO symbol on the subcircuit? Or are gnetlist looking at pin attributes so symbol on sub circuit must have a pin with correct attribute(s)?


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -