X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=fZQ6Uk4mcT2wUCzwoQXLMF9Ok89q14WAo0BJvvumFBw=;
	b=DLvHQHy1kPDl09ZBBLBiw6uSRiz7TKnkXMHUuJB4A7rIcVTaqhdxswpTsjDMS88973
	97Ag0qzw23Lxwd5HWzv6ozD1Jyjx0wEqYhP4KFAxP9g/khkCgn44WCVeO5leICvf3hdc
	8Si4m36V/6aen0QTNykyb5Q/66AVpVFlSHRkAmZx7aSTghtoUVyRQKsMn5cAaLI9MoYQ
	0C+KyFMTBll0B2zvEox/ZbuR7c3PXMkqAAdx6t6540Y8Z9Kj6iGMja3EpLVykhiDonT6
	OubFyWRHipNocoJxryGL+gJDXXlEuM2qgeWJnuDrE26uOFgrVWHBNj3CE3C2C8uaK+g7
	vP5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=fZQ6Uk4mcT2wUCzwoQXLMF9Ok89q14WAo0BJvvumFBw=;
	b=Lwt1cMon4a336qwN8HXu3ANdtrG2gGEZEB1vbeUL30LvAPtITRsKzKwaItay5OKH/k
	RTD/RasZ+IHWLNmWh8Nf9nkX5ZnSVAwSrqaG+mXiHgDDB5gdMhB7oMev4kjfYfGXIkXL
	f4wnd93VU9FxzJdoUh6OkuZyI+lVMXI398jIojBC9NE25qHsfAgAHlbZnpEbB1akYBmC
	kLijDyVTOpgxvDi6d25KYJADRmV0TKDi1GJAq5sv0q0ZuD71TESpXAplYKE3odSvihkn
	LiebJfpWJiYVMyR/gjJydqEQmWcMraty2Jxuskdq7CgkH7L8gH7/xGYoZaOo88mCsY/9
	DSVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AD7BkJKRYEupYWMBjPShdoQY36xIErpnoCF2s3YDlcUH9DuXMPpruE1PHN/a4ifhn3T+WGLZUsEYBjHZr5jImA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.143.9 with SMTP id r9mr7672291wmd.37.1456690223920; Sun,
	28 Feb 2016 12:10:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<E56E5601-2E20-4A6E-B44C-C4F04808B97F@noqsi.com>
References:	<20160215215221 DOT fd472794e7b9446a243bfc40 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602152055 DOT u1FKtM4K011038 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160215220938 DOT bbc7eaa59d827cd0b261ea97 AT gmail DOT com>
	<D3167F4D-4750-49F8-9125-BDC4937F5C69 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201602152135 DOT u1FLZrw9012774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<7F210DE7-0A0B-42F9-ABBE-2C2768621186 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160216081722 DOT 1065cbed6653d3da4ffc7498 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602160724 DOT u1G7Ox26001785 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160216085628 DOT b70143c330cd4da98a4603d3 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201602160805 DOT u1G85d8c003148 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160216092912 DOT 7f7439f703b49175a21dbb1b AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_w5NunkojiCr36RHRTq0hJ+PZP1e0GumTRMoGXcvgRXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602161715 DOT u1GHFMBB028078 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9jr_b376SpuUk5HrJApP1c75oxsEBemn-i_xtC-rt-Zw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602162032 DOT u1GKWL7Y005291 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-ig=0UVAqagNXH_DBmC9uVQDu3Y1Gx7LBGmRCo0-_kVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E75ECBB6-14E7-437A-B374-E0CF86BDFF1A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8z4JiJr=mgA+co4pX-yxu_pVsXpeKRYqneuxZNnYqh8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8ejSN3GrmB1Zw=Dx9Pm-3Y0jwjNs=yjmwgsqcoVW5ACw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<59CE9019-7A56-49D6-BC2B-680A7253B055 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<nauuv2$m6r$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<E56E5601-2E20-4A6E-B44C-C4F04808B97F AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 28 Feb 2016 11:10:23 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-ry2HnxmOHB2hARpcOMfuN4bb8rHmzZAD-z40pvOoVPA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb import schematic crash, parantheses in netname
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u1SKARdM024477
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:11 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> wrote:
>
>> John Doty wrote:
>>
>>>> as well since it will help gschem stay viable long-term,
>>>
>>> Gschem has no such problem.
>>
>> CERN chose kicad rather than gschem for their open hardware
>> initiative. Same with a number of high profile open hardware projects.
>> See http://kicad-pcb.org/made-with-kicad/ for some examples.
>
> And more people choose Word than LaTeX. That doesn’t mean that LaTeX isn’t a better choice for those of us who use it, or that it should be more like Word (at your suggestion, I tried Lyx. Ugh. Inflexible and difficult. Combines the disadvantages of both approaches).
>
> Eleven days ago, JAXA launched Hitomi (ASTRO-H) with ASICs designed with geda-gaf and ngspice on board. Quietest CCD measurement chains ever put into space.
>
>>
>> Please don't delude yourself int the perception everything is working
>> alright, when it clearly isn’t.
>
> Clearly not. But there’s a profound difference between what pcb users want and what geda-gaf provides. Geda-gaf's application space is far broader, but pcb users want something more targeted. Of course, geda-gaf is pretty simple and flexible, and we who script it can aim it at whatever target we wish. But there's a big faction here who don’t want to do that: they conceive of something as hard-wired, complicated, and inflexible as pcb (but perhaps easier to use for *their* application).

pcb has an action system.  It has batch mode.  It has a plugin system.  It has
a text file format.  It doesn't aspire to be "hard-wired" any more than gschem.
A number of people are working on making it more scriptable, not less so.

> It’s also true that much of geda-gaf’s intelligence is actually in your symbol library, so assembling a good symbol library for a particular purpose is a large part of the challenge. But as you know, this is also fraught with difficulty, because even the pcb application space isn’t a coherent, monolithic thing.
>
>>
>>
>>> It has been stable and productive for
>>> well over a decade.
>>
>> Just like pcb. Only that in this case it is decades.
>
> Except that if you watch this list, the most common topic is problems with pcb. A significant subset is problems with pcb that people expect geda-gaf to work

That's because what pcb is trying to do is harder.

>> Do you remember the poll I did a while ago? The results were non-
>> ambiguous.
>
> No, they were on a pcb-dominated forum. Not an unbiased sample.

The forum in question is also the largest gschem forum

Britton

- Raw text -