X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=RJ2h1By2j65moE78cVm9u74cHd8lHIeTEK2n43kVBuw=;
	b=Lr4ZKDtl3VY+fkH8RYqAu4MPi8qEWKc374hvZddg7h8eg+BMjlP8ciLPQmCHUSN3AT
	7To14cea6+o4gm444fe5NJpwNAiZMolrmge3wAwZ3T+I7DIa/zkN/7qtLMvmH8N8Hbav
	0sfCPDuuTgtpYhFbofJAEJrKtVP4SqLwsrWYr8s2suuBkqJ9c0YPBVIvSimAiNJ1u5+d
	wB+l1wET2wyElB5sT8GzfHPpWEi+bbopWDE0ImGSi/7qeQpjcFS2YbKUdAdXxxaq8nLc
	pYhJc8AuE2weLRTz3rn1q/974m7K3DEVl4X0rzzfhB8oFQm3FZiEbbz5DYcGcQaWL6Dw
	CZhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=RJ2h1By2j65moE78cVm9u74cHd8lHIeTEK2n43kVBuw=;
	b=HYkQN83yaSoJ6C4nk1U6Y2FX61ZqpdPUGybQPDEGJS0UjPqSuVHPCumhyND8tdYjv6
	YK+Hkj9czWmmY0ct1GRMHfDiwM1+kZDe006+O8/USNpMVej/8rAGFDtwroFpHz+Os4KT
	6ReljOqbTQUeqcIbxq4LPAxHypYDpjRs4GTF9bmgJBGNyEjR7C/otvapYqJK+2brdzj5
	fpGJt299IEnjJPmnPJz2ooRsHl3egbxQSZTTkMoG1gfzoNVc6oWNqmBgUN7gh7+tmjbL
	tacelOidDlwLAz9/ZR1oRfwX8pgp6DjVshnxn9Hj2Y63JoWJsa921m+6tY4tKs4Tm2Of
	GpIg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YOTlykXlrPlpaA0AAwt2O4YLvmf6mGlRnUjRRjrdqxAs2ww5xO50jEY/raUCRyy7SEcq9/PUfR/L3S7W+w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.71.70 with SMTP id s6mr42582083wju.1.1456388390668; Thu,
	25 Feb 2016 00:19:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<s6nwpptjk07.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
References:	<CAC4O8c_VGVSJ293PtQOj-YNan0TYnYadJHAQ8iAXN8ccg4pK9A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250321 DOT u1P3Lbr3003187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-nHp9sD50sKyP7DbcuCytZ_Lop4aCBqpRAPnaNXK=EvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250338 DOT u1P3cpuB003688 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_gKOdh26-wHsBLnGrC+akBuin8AeqaL4H+OAOh8LkiLA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nwpptjk07 DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:19:50 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c9RkPEANF2zAzf-XXc4sLJjjSLbug-aDc1-vgu6W8V9-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] exactly how is moving between sides/layers supposed
	to work, and more generally...
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u1P8JttO021157
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Stephan Böttcher <geda AT psjt DOT org> wrote:
> "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes:
>
>> Ok.  I think the overloading on B is good.
>
> No.  Shift-X acts on selection, X acts on object under the mouse.  If

The overloading I was referring to on B is already there.  Neither X
nor Shift-X are bound to anything in the shipping arrangement so far
as I can tell.  What do they do for you?

> you weaken that priciple the user experience will become worse, not
> better.

> Make the features more discoverable.  But please do not try to
> "optimize" them in isolation.

I'm not, I'm going through and finding all the inconsistencies they
have with respect to one another.  I'd like them to be more
consistent, not less so.  Maybe take a look at my original post.

Britton

- Raw text -