X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:11:49 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: djopt examples online (was: Re: [geda-user] djopt: what does it
	do?)
In-Reply-To:	<201602191717.u1JHH5w6023198@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1602200404580.7885@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1602180751480 DOT 7885 AT igor2priv> <201602180717 DOT u1I7HE3V013462 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1602190457580 DOT 7885 AT igor2priv> <201602190447 DOT u1J4lIlt002323 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1602190820180 DOT 7885 AT igor2priv>
	<201602191717 DOT u1JHH5w6023198 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, DJ Delorie wrote:

>
>> thank you for the support. According to your instructions managed to
>> produce working examples for all major features:
>>
>> http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/djopt/
>
> Thanks!
>
> I suspect the results would look better if you ran each option
> multiple times, I know viatrim won't catch them all on the first pass,
> and unjaggy might miss some too.  The individual optimizations
> intentionally don't loop, because the "auto" one loops them together.

I mentioned this in the text on top. I decided to go for one-pass because 
it might be easier to spot what exactly changes and how that is related to 
the text explaining the feature. I have to admit in case of viatrim it's 
the other way around.

>
> The "simple opts" one just cleans up straight segments so there's a
> break at every corner/pin and a few other things that make the layout
> "canonical" for the other optimizations.

Straight line segments: any suggestion how to visualize it on the png? 
I guess it wouldn't merge lines of different width or logical layer. Maybe 
having one of the line segments selected on the input... I'm not sure how 
confusing the color code would be on the pngs.

What are the few other things? Maybe I should have a separate row for 
each, with the same name but different set of example files.

> Also, you left the debumpify question to me in your example ;-)

Oops, fixed.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -