X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=hVJMrA4by/GtzN9Jt3ZxbN6aMWuukU7y0GQiIgmmMP0=;
	b=HRFN4hw/P5SiQug700o5XuS087qiH+xNkYMBZHPVsMFfdpFLkxmSLf+AXIjoUogJUn
	rjKWhS9s2u7tTTGUN+GU1FZrDLE9Ugo1gVqo/HxbB+KfPANHI3YtNnUwZpZuv9TP7x4K
	YD1F6ITLkvLOXSnecGxUnf2beWiW0i5k1l1Ruad8RbkSyWUR2SaFACh7JJmG/jfi61wD
	jWv6Z8uIARnFCDqYubOA2ekcF+HxzXmFNDyRm++Cx+XS5EyqoyxvV8N98uVJmMCuPocq
	QFItG9yd9KUg3IzdK8W3XTmVEBUIH6wA16WYyha4Y6vxbIWCnwT9fk/OmcDm2psvTbG0
	piZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=hVJMrA4by/GtzN9Jt3ZxbN6aMWuukU7y0GQiIgmmMP0=;
	b=CfygqPP/BfnMIybQ/tWqEJohWrAvWS5ogQ0uGz4iDI781jsWIJUAsvBTRzOme+HH2r
	14Lq7db7+oR1Z3Vz76rUmRVYQgJVDUBQbBxFEXASiLWgAFX2AMZw4phe7nCpSPTH/yZ+
	9bSWoKfhKg8xESs4H/OzgQSGPx4X7oRkvM7pDVXiXP+CbNyJVfwlLd5S/l2pcIn1+swR
	hicL1W2WZIRUCD8/Su5bPAySerygFrsG2VelzCHkCXckJyEXn9//R/kFlfdVH66QdZRF
	ni2SbJf+cjQJuQ353CxyjXoOLNqkv9G64Ln8LHGnAU7GZ/HNIDHkQkH1+Iqd5dxMS/JS
	301g==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YORsx+yPGrf0+Z5nz51ZHx3VvFg7va297PAS35hOuWNBE2GuEI1ApC8jxU7fvwpdRQ==
X-Received:	by 10.28.229.201 with SMTP id c192mr7329833wmh.103.1455055050934;
	Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:57:25 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Full Polygons
Message-Id:	<20160209225725.2bb691393030aca6fc15c225@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q9bedOPLyk0+2kP6rBFaZkdf7QfyD7hxiP_jfJvCYFqtA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q9H3HZ9dVNvXUt1GuPMimJWaJFTu6wcRKBtPJLU3w0hhA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-jnHbFzBtWk1YmMfjbt1TeRL9A9tUMUJz_U+18iQfyoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9bedOPLyk0+2kP6rBFaZkdf7QfyD7hxiP_jfJvCYFqtA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> The "lots of linking polygons" approach we currently need as a workaround
> is not ideal, as combined with the "biggest piece keeping" can require a
> tangled mess of drawn polygon shapes to successfully fill an area bordered
> by tracks.

Lots of linking polygons is time consuming and annoying.

> > The poly code with it's combination of holes, clearline, full poly
> > seems really ambitious and I'm vague on exactly what it's trying to
> > achieve.

A polygon with cut outs with size equal to clearance size?
Then there is of course the connectivity problem and elimination of dead copper or shards.

> The "PolygonType" object is certainly somewhat overloaded with behaviours :)

> Peter


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -