X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd (How ?)
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:51:13 +0100
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<n8bs6h$pf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601260416150 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <56A751EC DOT 8030402 AT iae DOT nl> <20160126124701 DOT 0d061912c7e078ced9d4e6cb AT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqgs3YFnt7m8mA1DN6X2KdWbyr4zpXCVH321vDo1f7CyxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c_qd2GUpL7GzYE8ccPp3=on-FstZe_1e+geLGS5PTNuTQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-157-238.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.10
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Britton Kerin wrote:

> Extra layers are not that expensive and most boards that care about
> density at all blind vias can make layout a lot easier even if they
> aren't absolutely required.  It seems like the major missing feature
> in pcb to me, and a pretty good guess that people would use them if
> they were available.
> 
Count me in. I'd probably use blind vias in all of my four layer 
designs if they were readily available. However, I am certainly not 
ready to switch to a fork because of them.

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -