X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=y47aUrGpHLoXmEbVBsJKP421dR7hlOmu6y3A7IMkic0=;
	b=GxulTKEmLOn6gAa54QFMPK6i+NO1J2Zg3u14fisrxCbnzd49DoHRygjW0XYDdO+kdS
	XxVBYFljDgBZTjzAbktxm7EcbPUgtNvGrqgRXr1OE+bM6uS7kYAamomJXxzFm054Kff8
	laUOZYx70hhFR3X4r5ocfNciw9Hwoniqn8B/EuJveTIfGrpBIzmJo3hEIHhfmWfcQ9C5
	8WgNQNmBjyx5i6sbaUrD+8yj0iOP+Za21aW5qJP2VTi2TaJrrKPueEScU/praAMyCEej
	52l/q6PuT37M7D+30nOhxjt1nmZcqG7UMoWji4V3CGPIkp6laSpX2CkibSE0XmsRVFkm
	H0xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=y47aUrGpHLoXmEbVBsJKP421dR7hlOmu6y3A7IMkic0=;
	b=O4PMZDE4sYxp9zHGPA0WI1XQB7GeB36E5cFYxJLScL9qRC4RGcZdEJWjhhLnpqCOef
	pH/sg1SBziKivmV+9X7OClf5TBKuoszV5uoLTxfbWLIQ5fifFhCfN10XJtkLQwHq6EZv
	zfADlcdgbMcmWrmfYONQTuSFfOc+jyS+Li7XEMSo2h7bqsiH68x1YpUeSb7OTJgggyv5
	yr0XWqtLFMYTO19cp5BRdbOC9VYvnkgGC9jIZoFU209PtZKALEINMYLPLsfWdCuVJXgr
	T4tlPSKZjhKy+qr3hlufQVchq9DNRly/aeczCnZJU5F8Qb+NQnuS0BknSbZWfnUA1H1l
	aguw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YORxshupRWSJVZTxDOhsGiK70118a6pzzlsodEArukjSIm7pkhPEjeXE5pCqLY22KA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.32.206 with SMTP id g197mr20699456wmg.28.1453746701737;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:31:36 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] Hierarchical design, pin number not needed
Message-Id:	<20160125193136.c1297d2b8e17f291e2250a4c@gmail.com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Then using hierarchical design netlist complain if there are no pin numbers in symbol although in pcb it seems everything work OK without the pin numbers.

Pin numbers in symbol for hierarchical design does not seem to fulfill any purpose since refdes in symbol and pinlabel in symbol link together the schematic. I think it would be better to get rid of the warning in netlist if it does not fulfil any function, do anybody have a comment?

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -