| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
| d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
| h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
| :content-type; | |
| bh=9yYSKN8Wx5SSilNgeKT6Aj7LiL6d1CQR8Um4TyreGis=; | |
| b=MGq71ws7ZRkgFszmekW+qvoD8bS6zRQ6HnLdEASuOke6NVN0vHK1nqAyGjWTbDrVrt | |
| CK7LWrtOOc79n/wbn7QVdUvayp5DnAJurmXtvd116NzVNPgjLcxUfidcC7wLzFqJUKtk | |
| SLcHXF2sQEN55zCc5bvklbnUIP2lTsOliMlQzC6NSYGAJcc7gee5JJKCZVmTg++UEkAI | |
| QtUn3mQiceIeVs5zETBlRBLQEBt4ubhvv39dlLYjtlNHFbvPBE3jslEUonNAbTFDbNFZ | |
| upQW1jMn9VVj5nBJAqdaii2oQi2s/PUoxjqHnPC66YvV9sXCuAIFa4xOz8xYkZBpGcYP | |
| UMTw== | |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
| d=1e100.net; s=20130820; | |
| h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date | |
| :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; | |
| bh=9yYSKN8Wx5SSilNgeKT6Aj7LiL6d1CQR8Um4TyreGis=; | |
| b=XHwWMTlYTyVAzQtEhtiYCjjX+14hUdtq2HSc1kvg1OC7EaGXNP85sqs3Tvyq+6rL7p | |
| RpfwsbIznImGVeZ5qbK99GEPPuKJp5dNvMOjtHNz/Tc3LC3Fi4EkYb0IMvxrW4n6Okua | |
| yMXBkwcdc0OOUoiyw89jOXCIOkGrEXBIDwHvu4CYDQqnkhobHPjPft3MLoK3RJ3SAzcs | |
| IGLPxg4OlHF30MTgh6Pk4rEMNz0eEcRTQzahMqTQIGjuWNyHNd9OinNddiwB1bhZFkWQ | |
| YLIbkUhLvyTbM4QzFcULcMdeAebGJh8dyyn6u7gyWVY+4ICqj6Ynk1VvD+SNp0y3DPQ/ | |
| XX1Q== | |
| X-Gm-Message-State: | AG10YOTq2VYgtNfUoGhrMgb+vK5rUc16NADlvsvdYY99yXb1kuhnzxZcgYBlRNdSN8plEr8LI/rbuOotjqjGwg== |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Received: | by 10.28.125.147 with SMTP id y141mr11698653wmc.18.1453407281521; |
| Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:14:41 -0800 (PST) | |
| In-Reply-To: | <20160121000930.e02a8a54b74efb839db9f7bd@gmail.com> |
| References: | <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> |
| <CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
| <CAM2RGhSLND5+JSSj=1cUPUhzkTCK6d7NZ61QL-eViZRccY5LqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
| <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311656190 DOT 1475 AT newt> | |
| <96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
| <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311916190 DOT 12724 AT newt> | |
| <20160120173024 DOT GB16858 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
| <201601201903 DOT u0KJ3Lx4026878 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
| <20160120210035 DOT 3859 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
| <CAC4O8c-R4VOPj9BrFOkLzYZt06Db6K9yurgr0rPy9RhZCaVJtw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <20160121000930 DOT e02a8a54b74efb839db9f7bd AT gmail DOT com> | |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:14:41 -0900 |
| Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c_vxbDZYFD6q+vfKKuX1wqg4J-xyB6VcbrCHFMASf3YXw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Releaseability of gEDA code |
| From: | "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--001a11419974bab14e0529ddc094 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Nicklas Karlsson ( nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via > > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > > > > DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > Do we want to change how we do development? > > > > > > For the sake of simplicity I am a strong proponent of having master > > > be releaseable at all times. > > > > > > > Then we need another branch unstable_master or something, because what > you > > propose means in practice that we aren't going to test each other's work > > much before unleashing it on unsuspecting users. Are you really likely > to > > go through and carefully try every branch? > > I think there should be a head/master branch there everything enter as > soon as possible. > > Then there would be a need to fork of "stable" releases, preferably only > disable features which do not work well because time spent on release will > to at least some extent be lost from development. > You just don't merge things that cause lots of problems into release_master. This way getting into unstable_master isn't a free pass: if it annoys everyone getting into release is obviously going to get resistance. But you can still develop off recent work without having to constantly juggle things between branches. Britton --001a11419974bab14e0529ddc094 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Nicklas Karlsson (<a href=3D"mailto:ni= cklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com">nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href= =3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"l= tr"><<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-use= r AT delorie DOT com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st= yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span= class=3D"">> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Peter Stuge (<a href=3D"= mailto:peter AT stuge DOT se">peter AT stuge DOT se</a>) [via<br> > <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] &l= t;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>> wr= ote:<br> ><br> > > DJ Delorie wrote:<br> > > > Do we want to change how we do development?<br> > ><br> > > For the sake of simplicity I am a strong proponent of having mast= er<br> > > be releaseable at all times.<br> > ><br> ><br> > Then we need another branch unstable_master or something, because what= you<br> > propose means in practice that we aren't going to test each other&= #39;s work<br> > much before unleashing it on unsuspecting users.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Are you r= eally likely to<br> > go through and carefully try every branch?<br> <br> </span>I think there should be a head/master branch there everything enter = as soon as possible.<br> <br> Then there would be a need to fork of "stable" releases, preferab= ly only disable features which do not work well because time spent on relea= se will to at least some extent be lost from development.<br></blockquote><= div><br></div><div style=3D"">You just don't merge things that cause lo= ts of problems into release_master.=C2=A0 This way getting into unstable_ma= ster isn't a free pass: if it annoys everyone getting into release is o= bviously going to get resistance.=C2=A0 But you can still develop off recen= t work without having to constantly juggle things between branches.</div><d= iv>=C2=A0</div><div style=3D"">Britton</div></div><br></div></div> --001a11419974bab14e0529ddc094--
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |