X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=yq+Q9OMvU9Nyudb/6qIO31D/QZ2OOuwayF2T4K0W/uw=;
	b=JEGOE2XtUhhfuSV+JR+d1i4lwtkCXq0ZZaJpHM2jnDQMdAJsEo80OgUemxzhaPB5Sb
	BFtFNhKWvM18Le1htzQcYgYa6wSOfpqpT5GuMctEwYnXhFsnVAKG4NLZBCT6b/UdnXxE
	g6RDUT4hk/s7atT9TPHbyTJmPj0ZUu3xXR9gn94pv4IvF3mcI2Hd/31nYREsSDvfRPkk
	dCOdPlHoXPQ0BMwpooS5A6V826J/DKylufs1AwcU4RK7LZ7ZOh1PHK6W7uZyQ8Y4+8LC
	w9PkPdccOO3qRW0KzcKmyuLz9gzE+c/y1E1m60myG8SHtqmrOj/EBVqee2KRzMLgqbn0
	zN2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=yq+Q9OMvU9Nyudb/6qIO31D/QZ2OOuwayF2T4K0W/uw=;
	b=DWJ8i4AdH0hSPdBh34gFomHdZtYGVkinXXpoloT9E+1Yf63qdGUH3NpGDrzLHyoFmw
	iBXCb63yF2uiuq8xc/BpVCN+RMUv+RiS9t9ghv64nclBZTq2QLllucuZADVDWnEmo9IV
	70xiFdh40eYikJMfA0qgOeYuuYr/vviAapH5M16URBHbDZ6pZOhsbX2NbAjG2dl+VwGx
	gZ8YGumFlcRA0JmhhXvmrN60xkglSe9EUbiUQQdgB9SBXMQV6hIwvIG4bQ1G112zqYr8
	s2ESKU2tWCfYAPtrjyClhtTHkDa2WBHIhhmolF/RGTZ4ouTau80yHNKZBQtDIdIyoV8R
	g2fw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQnWhBmHTUKddkifQkRqZv7QvK1etOlQ+1oSJTQUZvVCu0SVDCIXD97QwzrN3v0Qv860FvZgMfiz3lFJwjOiJk6m0e/Yzw==
X-Received:	by 10.25.146.193 with SMTP id u184mr16479509lfd.86.1453397686586;
	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:34:44 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
	Project leadership
Message-ID:	<20160121173444.GC4788@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<E811E14E-7BAE-4B45-86A9-2AF41F6F96B5 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAMvDHVA48zD5vaZFGj1XavVNcHKAgLY9YD5=9RLF7aPoJf1Tpg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1451827349 DOT 7723 DOT 31 DOT camel AT oscopy DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1451827349.7723.31.camel@oscopy.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi Arnaud,

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Arnaud Gardelein wrote:
...
> Speaking of Windows, note that on cygwin32 I achieved to use geda-gaf
> since Guile 1.8 was packaged.
> Those days at work I'm trying to compile geda-gaf (latest and 1.8.2)
> under Windows platform, cygwin64 environment. For latest geda-gaf the
> problem is that Guile 2.1 is available only from source, not cygwin-
> packaged. I tried to compile it, and found it a really harsh trip since
> when an error occur, I cannot tell whether I misrun configure tool
> (very likely), or an issue with cygwin (or bdw-gc for instance), or an
> issue of portability of Guile. From your comment I understand this is
> an hopeless task ?
> For geda-gaf 1.8.2, and it turns out that there is a missing
> gtkconfig.h somewhere, and here again I can't say whether I did
> something wrong.
> I can post a full bug report if of interest and if relevant to do it
> here.

I built 1.8.2 with guile 2.0 and it compiled better, or with less
errors, than 1.9.0 compared with the latter. I haven't published
this branch because I think this has no sense since from my point
of view nobody would be interested in such an old version these
days.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -