X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=bMxkWq7u6KREURKT62p00C8VmqTzrjsoHZ7Ilmw0b8E=;
	b=dZPCaxyudJvBi4UQm/sG32ToWQ/pRJ/jl3fzb9T6UvfFBcryFIxbHNBF/4UMEuL20F
	ToYeJHxTZUb6qfnWFVeLGPzdET+3gAM/j24spyRRYs6hRvKV0tL/BgWO0kEFikvvCp30
	0P/1s2SGKtkRgbwHrHe+yhsbuM049nlstAERowOvELVfNC1kb4yr78R/rMx/mvWXP4pD
	BdeyOistDBdmQDhtSPMd4/65eUqq/YKfXBCYnmUtVeRWAvGjC5iFLvyC8mHhBVhf8VbK
	4zCyQn9rYekYPRrl6NCzLOeQ6gXHnbSkuZjzqPgmw7rfIsA9Qfl58xBf6MqLtz3YFZnb
	0DKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=bMxkWq7u6KREURKT62p00C8VmqTzrjsoHZ7Ilmw0b8E=;
	b=fYxhNjEsFmvPgkgnCG5afej+0+adqkRw96/zfk+YKHo5WwISqSerwYuRGFreLqX9Rd
	SuVFOVO/lgbEvUh4s4U/4Y37BkmtOJjlzch1n2mBFLGHEXdivgSIrhn08mklRo+DHOhU
	jeoaAzFbG6CrYRfuoppcwSLVhtq22QDzmpmSFh+G+M+3IXfDQrG+zCwhMXe4tBSrclNw
	/9uWr8uOdMS9Zkm0v6K1FQs97+EQ11INDSkqIS/t1uAVVzHQA8ZnWirU/KgTXNCCvc9D
	meay5d6iup5cwmm3Lj9m6k+vcBBBrY4GkpVTFd/Ip1encrRyWTntTYWbaIp5JHlmixjd
	p5fA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YOTKiDN7cve8CAW7FWmnXo1TBgD1rf301k3wPZbnIgIT9Sv+1Wcb3ne3a58JR0/lGsHoDXG/YJ/3rUEdvA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.6.165 with SMTP id c5mr28041436wja.88.1453353379501;
	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:16:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201601201958.u0KJwPbo029901@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhSLND5+JSSj=1cUPUhzkTCK6d7NZ61QL-eViZRccY5LqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311656190 DOT 1475 AT newt>
	<96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311916190 DOT 12724 AT newt>
	<20160120173024 DOT GB16858 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201601201903 DOT u0KJ3Lx4026878 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_cvMt2gTBc0jm6+42wLC7O-iKz7PcVkkMsjAw7b8SAmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601201958 DOT u0KJwPbo029901 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:16:19 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAMvDHVCam8WAbG7w1kgYZqjAyV1BXwtTzsJgkRgD4+9zfEnM+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 1/20/16, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Clearly, master is always more likely to have bugs, as a result of
>> integration of new features (patch commit or merge - whatever), but I
>> think
>> it is always best to TRY and keep master in a state where we expect it
>> works, and expect we COULD branch a release from it.
>
> True, but there's a wide range of options (and paranoia levels)
> between "good enough to play with" and "good enough to release".
>
> What I don't want is to make it so difficult and/or expensive to get
> work into master, that work never gets into master.  We need to be
> willing to accept *some* risk in order to promote progress.
>

Main rules I use for myself are:
 - don't commit code which obviously has serious bugs or crashes;
 - if I have inadvertently commited something like this, either
   fix or revert it ASAP;
 - 'make distcheck' must always work; if it doesn't work, fix it.

- Raw text -