X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<569E9C40.6030708@iee.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:27:44 +0000
From:	"M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] cleaner version of fixes to file format plugin
References:	<CAC4O8c88EnAJ1H4YL4rj2O10ihZAz_NYDMSBAWEmdknMNu2b4A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q8AtP=UOZrM1e+7Vmimc5kxOjyNrrGjqxcanRTjBWsVDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <569BCA7F DOT 70903 AT prochac DOT sk> <569BCC77 DOT 60700 AT iee DOT org> <CAC4O8c9_kMdr+3xhe4-CZvUxPGzgqBrLN=Kn+WdGqGVcV1Nbnw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201601172146 DOT u0HLkPnT008691 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c8u_X54Ro2idbfBf8WToHg0tt2=BJ_irEHcZ7BVH6-_BQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201601191958 DOT u0JJwWro024659 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201601191958.u0JJwWro024659@envy.delorie.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K0:LZppdpti2jfgUC3MMKQMamtSxtls4QojqF4GDLaiEKKopDwvcpB
	eybG2ovwih1uAoMkTi2EZN66WdDRr2meMOEIqFxYqhsKfq9ri34pNW5of+PC8PXHLd6MEq4
	zrdzM4nfbicp8PgG5FNZGy8QwD7uo+K5ymjtXYU3kAYFf39EIndNnCldJhNu3MaCkEmHiJL
	tizyFB/1AtYUujKPFy4lw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:GAI7N2x16kA=:dw7sU77ovN2O0qnet4t2yW
	srKjJZQYyUHtm4YicVMRu/UL6vR1fMFuZk126vdfENYA+gwCf9haqJKNGmL1lPsjVhde0JK8O
	dxwpwm71B9MGiGMDIlIOO7d5PccS9SyXMxzUCW2Zwz/DTOeSFO2nltQ4pJJU3JlFTxbK0RWBp
	u5+9CqsanASNVErH8b4dI2rzNZoCA9UNHviPb1YlacDT3sqC0PfPnr+OyuRse4FJg8n71Ey/l
	stVLJBgp0VWgaMQpL1kJg6eulqaqIEa+gKJVKotIxz6n3l0k2slN46eA246Nd1BQ7/6M2yarT
	8VrwmyKDPVs8rbaScL9o++10div24FfrAw61BqT+jclHSKnX4U1EA02jnjq0nHuLDDweANItw
	ylF7va4JMrDIEj0wJ5zfIcpJKJPo4YyqQi/nqWJuLuKmvNn7sN2v2Qz6pCiheufgJ86wky3Yo
	5oFHhlgUP69vnEpBommpgKWoEk36FmEWBThx3HeVh40jByQXap52wum8TLN9bIUmEw43nkn47
	WUi9wDEc9BPgY8s8hipUipO64gGZqQoiuSgo/0dSHwYH+uHNtlD9k4A6YrIAhP1AlEloHPW2k
	bwvA0cnNLS7YzHRTzSOYLV+mhoSNPSTqbDM4ViRfeogBqxZ8XcuFIM8lMjaamNpBV4Zf6X7PT
	SiGJIonvQGKpOES7225Fjp0kAsn1n396oSQtLGWNAEp2rSjkM+69UaiviZyhaWq8SVwiboft3
	bLdsDsQ9xjWDn8fe
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 19/01/16 19:58, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I made branch home/bkerin/require_C99 a while ago and posted about it
> Posting patches is not the same as checking with all the distros we
> want to be in, and OSs we want to build for, and users we want to
> support, and see if requiring C99 would be a problem for any of them,
> then getting the maintainers to agree that it's a reasonable
> requirement, then officially making it a requirement.
>
> This process may or may not be easy, but it hasn't been done.
>
> We typically want to support more than just the most recent version of
> anything; usually a couple semi-major versions back.  Especially since
> we tend to have users and developers with old software (including me).
For what it's worth I'm going to be responsible for packaging versions
1.8-> for gentoo, and QA procedures will dictate proper compiling and
reliability checks. Since gentoo is using gcc4.9 I see no issues with
going C99. I think even debian is caught up to gcc4.8 these days, there
is no reason to get stuck in the mire, as long as compatibility is
maintained, we should be keeping up with current code practice (think
guile v2 vs v1) rather than hanging back and finding you can't build
something because your dependencies/code libraries/options are too old.

- Raw text -