delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=NSLGM2QuP94Y8QveRt+uB0MPbafYuAcs9oIWoBVDSHo=; | |
b=PBYgxds9LFJX6VIclPIH6cBb3HxZg2zbj+KP+V3JzLXmHCIp9rgvRHRm9KPte5mhzX | |
c9OyMyko7tQbhi7RDQT1VcGDWkvNQ9KqfoNyT7XhWPelujC9r7HGqvRy21/LE7LnBCkW | |
+n/g7W/QMX2HwIo+1XyRSbsAWZQStlhmL3+pvqgYtWQxeWFYJh8+RGlX/2x7mCkKwvzv | |
rZ0qpOmkzLKBe9iBzB73x+hS0+/B/cjdvI3/dbYf8S980ViTKUvWD3/FMKb+Dz5PWLK6 | |
XP4O0lMr9z9ZbSkBlQMPEQoZSlr+OUWIRfYDVuOatD9nWxIFmG1twalrOYZ1cG4SgXRj | |
8sQg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.182.245.167 with SMTP id xp7mr82871616obc.63.1452363721443; |
Sat, 09 Jan 2016 10:22:01 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <B7628CE0-70A1-4E3A-92E1-4E1D6B0B2BE2@sbcglobal.net> |
References: | <B7628CE0-70A1-4E3A-92E1-4E1D6B0B2BE2 AT sbcglobal DOT net> |
Date: | Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:22:01 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAJXU7q9NGxMz+NETUau7jS8gDbmWSoRkJu-Scnoi==SJBbSMzw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Bus Junction Size |
From: | "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9 January 2016 at 17:49, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > It appears that the bus junction size is incorrect in gschem. Here is a > screenshot and below is the source code. The bus and net sizes look > reversed in the source code. If everyone is happy with the net junction > size, I=E2=80=99m reluctant to swap them back. > > When I print, I scale down and target 17x11, and the nets are a bit small > on paper. > > What are others experience? > > Ed > As far back as I can remember, people have been adjusting the cue drawing in gschem. (And the grab handles too). I don't even recall bus junction cue from way back when - perhaps they never used to have them.. Peter --001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 9= January 2016 at 17:49, Edward Hennessy (<a href=3D"mailto:ehennes AT sbcgloba= l.net">ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie.= com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:ged= a-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>></span> = wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8= ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"w= ord-wrap:break-word"><div>It appears that the bus junction size is incorrec= t in gschem. Here is a screenshot and below is the source code. The bus and= net sizes look reversed in the source code. If everyone is happy with the = net junction size, I=E2=80=99m reluctant to swap them back.</div><div><br><= /div><div>When I print, I scale down and target 17x11, and the nets are a b= it small on paper.</div><div><br></div><div>What are others experience?</di= v><div><br></div><div>Ed</div></div></blockquote><div><br><div>As far back = as I can remember, people have been adjusting the cue drawing in gschem. (A= nd the grab handles too).<br><br></div><div>I don't even recall bus jun= ction cue from way back when - perhaps they never used to have them..<br><b= r></div>Peter<br></div></div></div></div> --001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |