delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:52:59 +0100 "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > In preferences-->Layers-->Groups some of the layers are listed but > not all are listed. What do you think is missing? I would add explicitly the insulation layers, and documentation layers, silks, etc. I'd add user defined layers as well. I'd add some logic like "XOR this layer with that, and use it as conductive 2." > For padtack which could be used for: pins, pads, via ordinary, via > buried, via blind: I suggested a group of ordinary drawing primitives > could be grouped together but no one said if this is a bad or good > idea. I also suggested this group you call a padstack could be placed > in a library with sub folders for different package types so they > could be used many times. This might be very far out but a discussion > how it should be done is always a start. Yes. That would be nice. A library is also a hierarchical structure. It contains the pads, padstacks, footprints. Yes, the padstacks are built up from primitives. If I go on, and implement the SQL based file format, it is easy. I defined pad and padstack tables. If we go the YAML way, I don't know how to represent that data. Lev -- 73 de HA5OGL Op.: Levente
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |