X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ISXuuJBWy8YRLnJvvjvffAvgtvAIwjmu3un4+yNrmWA=;
	b=un6JLm5h6PQMucJYFNLxh5OKPAfjJ9NvKJ3ejrIcp9fyT4NmFMdODzmI036UKkQmpa
	HpSYpiHQKcRrPOCSxKmsvhCWRfRXXaydB69wuF550YY9Z2f8oCe5aSReEEaJDFuoiHZq
	crs9MbKecD62yuTqA5yKbtH4JeGOvnEeWAtxaKzRwJwh0jbeJ7wJfiNewkFjtnoO/Q+x
	uaF/UA+o+4YSL3HuRZN1huk0jZjbv7bjIwJRv0a9gzx8PWEq3Zu5Qr7lokLZH2l20RUh
	wWFq2zyCIi3I6F2EXiE9yaksVODPI1mR5tcGbws0HoopOyWNoSEuGGRXeYqkcFcbxQZI
	PB9w==
X-Received:	by 10.195.18.5 with SMTP id gi5mr12313958wjd.167.1452190978824;
	Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:22:58 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:22:53 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] geda/pcb development
Message-Id:	<20160107192253.6637595d43db972917706476@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<568E9CBE.3090203@iee.org>
References:	<568E9CBE DOT 3090203 AT iee DOT org>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:13:34 +0000
"M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> I know I'm the newbie on the block here, but can I suggest that we get
> together a list of 'in-progress' improvements and a 'wish-list' of
> improvements on the wiki pages, and assign volunteers to the
> sub-projects so that we can track who is what/where. Sub-projects can
> then have a wiki page to detail progress and any issues/discussion that
> might be helpful.
> 
> There's lots of ideas floating around the place in various stages of
> completion. How about we finish/test those that are valid, and merge
> them to trunk, then address the next 'phase' of improvements?
> 
> Just my two-pennies ... :)
> 
> Michael.

I have started to look on the bug list and are willing to give clearance a try, first bugs to get to know the code but later maybe improvements.


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -