X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<568DFDAD.3040700@iee.org>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:54:53 +0000
From:	"M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen
References:	<CAC4O8c_p5bMB1cKzDEsQFSnbZvY3TgnczH94pO_qCoJmiv2iWQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q9rMcQpLU5020RoZTqskT4moOS6f3Ugw+g3_mhO565MLg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c-nPx1isS2DA4=X1vQFVY51vQ6pAY6sSfHBMog_m0_2dg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q8jLiY2oAGmkgfXfzdNoAg2xVRx8bxgAXyF_qqYs=9Dgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c8=Vh7DcVrdrG4GE7ssBNG_VuxDLw2JSyg=Bv7Lnvfysg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q-iNx7PVbZHe_SC+VGs1SN-zOSPEyQjBc6CS2qD8wnpvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c8sm-jp7+jvV_QJ9Zskwb31JsmPUA+BY2UkUMg31_Htsg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJXU7q_K3xSdNWaZy3AZ_zCCAGWjvasc8TrJYrD5xz-CZujYDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160106192411 DOT 7d9fd782 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106190750 DOT 32335 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAJXU7q_A8eFsFdZ5yGercSs5SNPjwz81qc3ArH4jtOV=o-VO_g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601070551580 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1601070551580.9035@igor2priv>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K0:BVi3a57l2Jopa19v88OimphIKP0Sn65vfrP5oeySSUreIJSuJ3m
	rezT5q6CDWawLGQ+VtMu78bkMFTdzf8AvLqdFxhUKa+xufhtuFoBnJjgXcmGMK80z0/gfIv
	VYzNEfEuQ2RNlff0x0Nu3p73RhSFvn+IpqaqyKP0QnMV0UHWk+ctRqNYhv/nnR8hNAaRLBj
	FyV6KIqKIAhKRvKOsfugA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:fhNAZn+/d9Y=:yjHVIeQsNGFZDBbkChb92m
	3Kk7UG0T3F3DIbeGTV/jgL//CQfydsigrnm94HmpxYVy2qtS4+hoF7oe/nm71Afn4qaZhbYza
	zZhSraZwFkqgYZvz2yA2LN2UQaRk1gZjSvjlKgr4X0MLlCylmK6KqdhGtiGv6YJwXuvyYeaQY
	pw4fYfemJcZOsWzvOT70BdSws3R4dsJwV1qIz0qBAylOxTGXTNuXVXYjeO+ATVbjUCCZptn5a
	FEM/BV0rccGfuytHkmx2WkqLLdifk6NLKYXJw00Ay93cFLLrfRrUKQxNIPNjaUQdeGckwKDrx
	sC6xjgb6DbCHeneqeYH1N1c6uRNWYYm7MsPmZvJOpBLUovEGbpE2x4KBBMfz6d1KmcbC/1mhW
	TFBLhvgOcDNxMWBtN23rruWKa19RUp1F4ZcUarOkZCguKBO9ajvbkuc6fRcm9cfmiXvkrP/bv
	sZyzrKPS0bZdx2p6CcuRiu1udDN44oU/nJNlg7fyZ04vGxXmBJgSt32WpRiu44hbBqqRUQeLW
	ELK+Vi29AXHDfQWqVsMBztvvJ62aiJWh3pqAoALF7f186VbjRux8Mick9qTFutMyQcln9lrwT
	jliopKpCK63F2g8oux9300H4x1P1lhAFl2N+fMuDlSWJfZBRF8+m7IWVqMLjwf35/wHhWar9r
	xdhbAb7dJpnVE5UT3MbwzXvknwUxpbaAWSLuC0mcdPgTZ5Ti0zp9lqDBweLRpWswCoQL+Bn1g
	NJU2TnE4WwtpsfEZ
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

I think you should propose a change (of reformatting code) .. and let it
'sink' in .. and generate discussion .. and then set an appropriate
release/milestone to achieve by. Coders can therefore share the burden
amongst them, to achieve the goal, and Voila, you have code conforming
to a 'standard' you're agreed on :)

Michael.

On 07/01/16 04:56, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
>> Indeed - we can document requirements, but auto-reformating large
>> chunks of
>> the code will cause un-necessary pain for people (like myself), who have
>> outstanding patches that eventually want to be finished up and
>> committed to
>> HEAD.
>>
>> Peter
>
> Btw, if the project does decide to auto-reformat, please advertise
> this on the list, there may be forks out there.
>
> I have the opposite of your problem: I'd like to reformat pcb-rnd, but
> so far resisted the temptation to make my patches easier to apply to
> mainline or other forks. Once the mainline makes that move, I won't
> have a reason not to do it, this why I'd like to know about it by the
> time it happens.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2

- Raw text -