X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=vwo8o/cV3f8jEQSwaChNGwewUQ5yEf9qETXI5FeMBeQ=;
	b=G4zExAN3EqxCo6cTyoPvy9ylyHHeWqfHbjDAmotGawHNXNiF+HXDmuLGnfEypzIKhn
	usV2i81wKg5EYEx08yvGlmm3dcYi/74QZ0a7dRq9e5i4YXpkoRaKS/OO52rrddqCUM9y
	q2p6+znElR/UvcQafdWMjwUJVTBwvo0VdqJzhMwHAAwyoW7+2GJW4ATSIzf4/WWhqpU4
	z8ZLX/NajZLI8X0hUllx7vBbZEACtmWywKdmOS02Dobefq/lzLusfUczZ0ZKNOKhe4zh
	Gcnv1X1zZad2BXx6kfjppu2zk2tMWXaXMLPew6H+4rrgt/pPSWRoysJoVPI3rbXpRRRu
	iB1w==
X-Received:	by 10.28.113.220 with SMTP id d89mr9276529wmi.56.1452070964430;
	Wed, 06 Jan 2016 01:02:44 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:02:42 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: some more geometry module tweaks (sorry, wall
	of text)
Message-Id:	<20160106100242.40c60b971948626efe04eb32@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1601060519350.9035@igor2priv>
References:	<CAC4O8c-n4cHWum2MUzgDw=NLuKPK395xp_F24cSyoXhnADRskw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512230503390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8A271d5unQWRV=PoaEsJECgZt33Wy16uCnK6D+4LCzww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512260402081 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c-49Fn191KT-p0hXi1jXW=OeTSaNUh11pLmBQYHeGtyoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512310512510 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8Or1FS=x18C7Zv5uu+dUOXX2My4K+njsoufNeotm_CBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601060519350 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> 2. live with imperfection, and don't care too much where it lurks as long 
> as the code generally works (I believe this is how most of the code 
> worked in the past)
> 
> 3. live with imperfection, but try to explicitly nail it down to make sure 
> it's under control

I think imperfection mey be  a problem for: repeated movements, clerance in combination with DRC for clearance and overlap. Or are there more cases?

- Raw text -