X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:56:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
In-Reply-To:	<2F0AFAE8-ADAB-4DE0-A79C-DD87077E66B5@sbcglobal.net>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1601010135550.2280@newt>
References:	<5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <CAJXU7q_GnuGNMtUWkB-xgBiKgY5R5W4ZCjtnz5EJizG+46dm1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C7FDF8B6-B335-46C3-8A25-F95ACECF4B79 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhS2bg=Rjuq6oEeOacV7PfUENy_jq7dxag=vWsUbdH6pAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151229155647 DOT GA3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhSLND5+JSSj=1cUPUhzkTCK6d7NZ61QL-eViZRccY5LqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151229175222 DOT GD3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311656190 DOT 1475 AT newt> <96A12FC1-E09C-4D63-8346-5A62FDAB4228 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1512311916190 DOT 12724 AT newt>
	<2F0AFAE8-ADAB-4DE0-A79C-DD87077E66B5 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Either option C or D works. Option B makes it harder for other 
> developers to make distcheck.

Ok.  I don't currently have the time to dig into the internals of the test 
driver, so it probably would be (d).

> Do the features in the backend require Scheme/Guile development, or just 
> Python?

Just Python.

Thinking about it, I'm not even sure if this behavior (treating the slots 
of a package as individual SPICE objects) is even necessary.  The other 
SPICE backends don't seem to be using it.

- Raw text -