X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=nT8hPQbHk+MV6rkYiIGC2p/mIa+bWRNkpGLqk07hcVQ=;
	b=NYbtqBp239LGpEuzX13KwOrjjK2PsX9BHSIQ6flr2UtBofwSlXebnuVLAhUC23XBBj
	RHmgw3MaZGwB6qfTcp2iy/t3xMQkfl0Ym59nCWDO9SigqeFj0TjlveFn71HFuLWGhLo1
	a46fDANfsqQqxW0ZBJjQBVNWiu5u8VYdPvarIsoA5tJWoAOnHUuiOfFE8fzFBI6OE9RE
	Zw+cbwMgxHiOvPt+mKkyz+LSquqc+6BwOhqZ4qHQEXhyMeF274nhtbAUQtMRI7k2LYGi
	s7kCxHDIb9OTD5vO7ow9f2m5FDLQQ3IY0Giv0fL/SeplUB8CiUfG/KYHiRyCjj0Tkw6u
	RTgA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.213.78 with SMTP id m75mr47401103oig.56.1451842948322;
	Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:42:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<E537CDD8-BE58-4A3C-8D1C-0AC0D31A89E7@noqsi.com>
References:	<1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
	<CAJXU7q_mXmipJ1fLvLpuLvnYjktV2SHoA+bG=L5+E-EfdygeOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<s6n37uumanm DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<CAJXU7q_qxdvJaejF-VcY=u7VHZ-zrfrc+Z7-qSwfFyPdy-umxw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<B02363CD-469D-493A-AC15-1D5DC7836982 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20151222232230 DOT 12633 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<0F6F1D0F-4F07-48EA-90FE-836EAD4E2354 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTficnys3a4xs=UBFvk8aPwpzYWUADFLP_pUQ+R1iKs0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<0FCF3774-F93C-4BFF-BB61-636F75DCCACB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_UAiFE-vGfoE2tXppHLhaa0dSYz9o_rkdCBo7_SRRtxw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FFBE7623-E240-4798-96B0-2BECF56C8E29 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c980g1gj15=5njstC_BT-WYDgKQx9BRycdFKA8OvgtiOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<B54C0E1F-1986-4C79-9F70-7F1919B8B26D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9bxJP1eMG4yz3YwKkQJRmsDGmLQ0aMd5pJRyu0WpdCtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C1CFCCEE-C64A-4E49-AA64-446C061656D6 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-zt8B=joDd+ws77D2jt6aZf3MWfR_dAvpzGcNuBrTURQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601030040320 DOT 2176 AT newt>
	<AE426D72-46DE-4941-9D58-95015A10C6EA AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c93CJm5LRehr28zzUTa6eqG9QQgBUMCz=zNpiwZPGOk4Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FCE4FD21-C98F-4860-B78B-EBF657427E91 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8OpV2zNoZF48N3_CQBdZVO40mcpD7fFGs5aZ_4r2QY7g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E537CDD8-BE58-4A3C-8D1C-0AC0D31A89E7 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:42:28 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q8fkpAuqHszX8Q-0_P-sqV9z3Rr4UR=92JaQN72Lfw8pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a113aca4e34593605287187b1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3 January 2016 at 14:48, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

No apology needed. I=E2=80=99m a scientist, I=E2=80=99m used to this. I rec=
all the time I
> was publicly accused of =E2=80=9Cwitchcraft=E2=80=9D for digging out a re=
sult using an
> unfamiliar statistical method. The accuser then went back to her lab, too=
k
> another look at her own data, and proved I was right. We never saw a
> dispute as personal. Scientific research is like this: we have titanic
> arguments with our friends. That=E2=80=99s how we bring all of the facts =
and ideas
> to light and get the science right.
>

Sounds rather dysfunctional to get as far as "titanic arguments"... and
that is not conduct we should expect or condone here. (From anyone).


Best wishes,

Peter

--001a113aca4e34593605287187b1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 3=
 January 2016 at 14:48, John Doty <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:j=
pd AT noqsi DOT com" target=3D"_blank">jpd AT noqsi DOT com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">No apolo=
gy needed. I=E2=80=99m a scientist, I=E2=80=99m used to this. I recall the =
time I was publicly accused of =E2=80=9Cwitchcraft=E2=80=9D for digging out=
 a result using an unfamiliar statistical method. The accuser then went bac=
k to her lab, took another look at her own data, and proved I was right. We=
 never saw a dispute as personal. Scientific research is like this: we have=
 titanic arguments with our friends. That=E2=80=99s how we bring all of the=
 facts and ideas to light and get the science right.<span class=3D""></span=
></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sounds rather dysfunctional to get =
as far as &quot;titanic arguments&quot;... and that is not conduct we shoul=
d expect or condone here. (From anyone).<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>B=
est wishes,<br><br></div><div>Peter<br></div><br></div></div></div>

--001a113aca4e34593605287187b1--

- Raw text -