X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
X-Virus-Scanned:	clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] ideas on slotting and mechanisms for
	grouping/associating heterogenous symbols.
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300544550 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<87FC7D4C-157A-499E-8B93-97653D6A7C68 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601012231450 DOT 1728 AT newt>
	<AE52C1DB-01A3-43FA-AE8E-68AD33F37180 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<624E6A69-62CE-4FCB-9D44-9FDF036254A3 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<56880043 DOT 7040003 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20160102182739 DOT 5d195829880cf75768ae0a82 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201601021755 DOT u02HtOWs020325 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160102191018 DOT 5e68c0c4ecc70a49bd9998f6 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201601021816 DOT u02IGHCC021127 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<568817CC DOT 7090207 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<201601021843 DOT u02IhC5U021940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20160102203149 DOT 375887378ec1a58ee7e9bc79 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201601021936 DOT u02JameZ023677 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
Message-ID:	<568882B7.6060607@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:08:55 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Icedove/38.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201601021936.u02JameZ023677@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 01/02/2016 01:36 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> There needs to be
> some way of correlating "these pins on the chip which I assigned in
> layout" with "this symbol in the schematic" and refdes is not unique
> enough.

To me, pin swaps outside of one package are beyond the scope gschem needs work on right now.
gschem needs upgrades first.  It's also beyond any of the detailed ideas I had for planning.

To my way of thinking, it you do "annotation of *any* type" back to the schematic, you need
to keep it small, say 6 or 8 pins, then rehook it up with some loose guideline like ratlines,
or it gets to be too much.

I can't code on it anytime soon.  It's "out of scope".

- Raw text -