X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	karl AT aspodata DOT se
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda
In-reply-to:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1601021922530.4119@newt>
References:	<20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAJXU7q_Zwyfpcb4g00QCFNTjQ9Le2Tm8WjKz3CKMnNXb7gMceg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601021922530 DOT 4119 AT newt>
Comments:	In-reply-to Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
	message dated "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 19:41:50 +0100."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20160102190222.63BE6809D79B@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:02:22 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Roland Lutz:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > On 2 Jan 2016 09:18, <karl AT aspodata DOT se> wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it make sense to move things (that isn't related to a gui)
> > > from gschem to libgeda ?
> 
> It's more the other way round--libgeda contains many things which are 
> related to the GUI and should be moved to gschem.  IMHO, it would make 
> most sense to pull the general-purpose and gnetlist-related functionality 
> out of libgeda and merge the remaining code back to gschem.
...

So, what you are saying is mostly that we should leave libgeda as is for
backward compatibility and move xorn to a more finished state, as far as
scripting is conserned ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57

- Raw text -