delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 |
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: | repl |
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: | inbox |
From: | karl AT aspodata DOT se |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda |
In-reply-to: | <CAJXU7q_Zwyfpcb4g00QCFNTjQ9Le2Tm8WjKz3CKMnNXb7gMceg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAJXU7q_Zwyfpcb4g00QCFNTjQ9Le2Tm8WjKz3CKMnNXb7gMceg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Comments: | In-reply-to "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
message dated "Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:52:51 +0000." | |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-Id: | <20160102131252.F383A809D79A@turkos.aspodata.se> |
Date: | Sat, 2 Jan 2016 14:12:52 +0100 (CET) |
X-Virus-Scanned: | ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Peter Clifton: > On 2 Jan 2016 09:18, <karl AT aspodata DOT se> wrote: > > Wouldn't it make sense to move things (that isn't related to a gui) > > from gschem to libgeda ? ... > For my point of view, moving some of the low level code from gnetlist, into > libgeda makes sense. It could start to allow a framework where we use > plugins that apply some of the semantic attribute meanings at a point > shared between the tools. (Meaning you can have smarter behaviours in > gschem whilst those workflow specific plugins are loaded). I would love to > see things like slotting move to being a plugin, for example. ... Interesting point. I stumbled upon this when looking into this (from the (priv) thread that was stopped by DJ (I think because my reply didn't come through)): John Doty: > Karl Hammar; ... > > A midterm solution would be to write a gnetlist backend which copies > > used symbols into a given directory. That could be a nice way to learn > > scheme and gnetlist perhaps. > > Gnetlist doesn't have an API through which it can find that data. > The gaf command, might, though. As far as I know, nobody is > exploring the possibilities of scripting gaf. ... So currently, if I want to write an "get all syms that this sch file referencs"-program I have to do it in c or don't use libgeda at all. I thought that kind of program could be a nice way to learn a little scheme, but the infrastructure wasn't there. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |