delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:12 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:17 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am not against people being unix literate. Requiring people to know >>>> how to use a command line is a good thing but scheme in the core is >>>> just too far. >>> >>> Yet a decade ago this was not a big problem. Scheme gave users the ability to export data to a variety of downstream flows, a unique gEDA capability. >> >> For the millionth time I am not trying to remove scheme! There are a >> lot of contributions there (gnetlist) and I would not suggest even for >> a minute removing them. >> >> The choice of scheme was a mistake > > I disagree. It was very fruitful. > >> but that is done and we have to >> keep it now. We should have another interface in parallel to it *not* >> replacing it. > > Well, what about Xorn? Xorn is one approach but I would rather add to what already exists than to use your word "dynamite" what is already there. If scheme bent the shape of the surrounding C then Python will do the same because the point of Xorn the python. Plus you need to look back at your records we have had this *exact* conversation at least once before and I think possibly even twice. >> >>> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >>> http://www.noqsi.com/ >>> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >>> >>> >>
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |