Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/10/27/14:51:24
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:15 +0100, Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Okay, I don't want to start another war here. I was browsing the
> manual of
> the CGAL library, and I think it has some nice features that can bring
> lot
> of benefit for us. So I'd go for CGAL.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Lev
Yes, CGAL is very powerful, it is actively developed, has good
documentation and active mailing list. (I had the feeling tree years ago
that gts lib was death, no activity on mailing list.) For constrained
delauney triangulation I found no other easy solution, coding that from
scratch is much work, and only fast in an compiled language. Similar for
appolonius graph. It is C++ with templates, with my basic C++ knowledge
I had some hard days getting it to work. My Ruby glue code is basically
plain C, but one has to understand some basic template stuff.
- Raw text -