delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:20:41 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201510250420.t9P4Kfes017141@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20151024105936.3de408e6dfa2135be27cfb4a@gmail.com> |
(geda-user AT delorie DOT com) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] support arcs with square ends?, ellipse segment |
arcs? | |
References: | <CAC4O8c8Jtm61QCsvnzLpP2fBDqRFU4j8g4Euf19yexgyWMOM4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<201510230205 DOT t9N25Fhv002633 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151024105936 DOT 3de408e6dfa2135be27cfb4a AT gmail DOT com> | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> As is now arcs for 90 degrees work well but ideally arc angle should > depend on connecting lines, did I understand this correct? Arcs with arbitrary start/end angles are already supported, and used by the pullers and toporouter.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |