delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=Vqo2KKxEr+VUOqD1Dr13ER5cKCPLm6jLO1+OjOuagkE=; | |
b=g9dGcj3tYFUUhUziPgc6rgv+vbV4gUFSDPFTxkL6Tz1sC+xpBhyp9Il848EzOpE2UI | |
w2F1pAuTlRpwHbky6CoySM4yNLmnFpjaiQzkM1z2ZI5hcOQTezLeer5MVJnwjYYDlva6 | |
cVSVukEQdndUTH1nfPZFenK590T8mMJPFIYcyOnhf8VT9W4c5C1WPksDHh1Mwlw3Nudo | |
R7PHS68oAF1Jqaj+M6b63V4QcViMZntISq0P1ecOM0indwmh7E7+na7u/n2+J5esvGB3 | |
A7DyhTi/rCXkvGomnUFZ3b4VTuHNaUEPik1jLzw+2MuK+nWgNYLzhMFjO0B3nkcz5ZMW | |
gWGQ== | |
X-Received: | by 10.28.109.193 with SMTP id b62mr1055183wmi.58.1445713012354; |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:56:52 -0700 (PDT) | |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:56:44 +0200 |
From: | "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Star shorts |
Message-Id: | <20151024205644.39b5cad134a01926e79f86e5@gmail.com> |
In-Reply-To: | <CAC4O8c-5ukywtH+-=Zs=BXvLtn7WwdrabapkyrhEU7=ssvXqJA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAM2RGhQhNkShqtN8uyCSd7R+V4FgLXDZTvTC2RTdmKF7C_8ndA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<CAM2RGhQOpnBXbZXngNq=RcQTZN=UrU+PGzTZ9AC=xKNfu_zQkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201510220149 DOT t9M1nrIe016145 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<CAM2RGhQ26+gpcAeTdgJpBEh0egOGLYcpizQ+B6kfTQLowEk5xQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151022023002 DOT GA25952 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> | |
<CAM2RGhQ7xfMDe1knmiFkW8MAZ4Sr=ZSas8Ca9Sadv3gJT2z3gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201510221643 DOT t9MGhFfg003310 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<20151022170259 DOT GA28154 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> | |
<CAC4O8c-AGwV59t6-K+73eaZt0d43bJe0kE8E68n9pWxaa9gP+Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151024050756 DOT GA5741 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> | |
<CAC4O8c-5ukywtH+-=Zs=BXvLtn7WwdrabapkyrhEU7=ssvXqJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
X-Mailer: | Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > On to PCB (or any other layout too; John Doty can close his ears for > > this part). AFAICT, there is no established technique to implement > > such a star short in a way that will pass DRC. There needs to be > > copper half-inside the DRC process, that definitely shows up on the > > Gerber output. This copper can't exist during the netlist check > > (optimize rats). > > > > To my feeble brain (it's been a difficult week) it would make sense > > to use a special-purpose layer for this job. The star short component > > would put copper on it. it would show up as part of one layer > > for every step except the rats processor. I guess this extra layer > > could be paired with any copper layer? And you could have star > > grounds (and this layer) for any copper layer? The footprint would > > have to be carefully designed (and maybe depend on the design rules?) > > so that there's no chance of any copper, other than the wires attaching > > to the star, touching the ghost copper that makes the short. > > > > Another option would be to somehow have pcb keep it's nose out of any > connectivity that happens intra-footprint, since that's none of its > business, and make overlapping pads. I was going to propose this, and then > realized that pcb would actually probably consider it a short. So I think > the current behavior (assuming it does complain) is not intuitive. This > could lead to nasty results for broken footprints of course, but broken > (e.g. pin-swapped) footprints are always nasty and there's nothing gEDA can > do to catch that sort of thing. I think pcb design rule check should care about copper regardless of how it have been created because that's what physics like ohms law care about. Nicklas Karlsson
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |