X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Ironport-SBRS:	None
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:	true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:	A2E8AgAzSShW/52AA4BdgzaBQ4JcuzgBDYFZhh0CgT84FAEBAQEBAQEDgQeELwEBBDoxHgsYCRMSDwUNPBOIGwMSBb8vDYRnAQEIAiGGd4R+glCCRIMagRQFh0eGQTuHZIspgW2UXYdNHwEBQoIRHYF1HjSGQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV:	E=Sophos;i="5.20,180,1444719600";
	d="scan'208";a="2925535"
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:30:02 -0700
From:	Larry Doolittle <ldoolitt AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
To:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
Message-ID:	<20151022023002.GA25952@recycle.lbl.gov>
References:	<DA7D969B-6516-4633-831C-FFADA38E1807 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRN5S1KZCNFQwoVTPg3=mC5xrK2z9XTOpWwPuF0iVS+Rg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSvpVvboJ-gdyrojAzggFEBnAr30CKNQBefjci-PA1n6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQhNkShqtN8uyCSd7R+V4FgLXDZTvTC2RTdmKF7C_8ndA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQOpnBXbZXngNq=RcQTZN=UrU+PGzTZ9AC=xKNfu_zQkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220149 DOT t9M1nrIe016145 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQ26+gpcAeTdgJpBEh0egOGLYcpizQ+B6kfTQLowEk5xQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhQ26+gpcAeTdgJpBEh0egOGLYcpizQ+B6kfTQLowEk5xQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Guys -0

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:03:43AM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:49 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> > It would be great if you could just connect two
> > nets like that and have the system remember the topology long enough
> > to DTRT in layout.  But in gEDA, this type of connection only results
> > in an error.
> 
> Well I was approaching that with the stuff I was talking about in the
> other thread but I realized there were fundamental issues with it.
> This is kind of why I was thinking about star grounds. Really this is
> a type of star topology.

I don't think this failing is unique to gEDA.  I just had a
board laid out in PADS (schematic in gschem), and some analog
stuff had to be left hand-wired, non-design-rule-checked, because
of this exact issue.  Just like in PCB, there seemed to be no way
to communicate to the layout tool that two nets are supposed to
touch in a defined spot, but be independent.

I think it's easy enough to create a "star" component in gschem;
getting a layout tool to deal with it seems harder.  I've heard
of hacks involving extra layers to make it happen in PCB.  The
team of PADS experts (not sure if a smiley face belongs there or
not) couldn't even imagine a way to make it happen for that tool.
Other than adding a bunch of zero Ohm resistors, which I rejected.

  - Larry

- Raw text -