delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
El 21 de octubre de 2015 19:42:21 CEST, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> escribió: . > >I have not found a case it fails to detect, but it correctly detects >nothing for a big project where drc2 spews out hundreds of spurious >errors. You know drc2 needs you to fill in some info in order to do the job correctly. Do you? You know that drc2 is highly configurable and near all tests can be disabled by configuration. If any of them does not fit your needs, just disable it. I agree drc2 could be better, but something is better than nothing. You are fluent in scheme. Why don't you help to improve it instead of complaining about it every time? One of your fears is that some change in the code break some backend. You know there are regression tests trying to avoid this. They could not be perfect, I agree, so, why don't you help to improve them? Regards, Carlos
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |