X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings)
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:46:52 +0200
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<n049us$rcm$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com> <201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151018233004 DOT 78db1f9df1b1e68325c8639e AT gmail DOT com> <n03l6g$91u$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <201510192106 DOT t9JL6PAx006922 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-62-119.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:

> My way of using it would be to have symbols keep their symbolic pin
> "numbers" like A,B,Y or B,C,E.  Footprints would have numeric pin
> numbers as usual.  The "package" would include a mapping from
> symbolic to numeric pins for that package.  The netlister would
> apply the conversion based on which "package" was chosen.
> 
Yes, that's what I was thinking, too. 
My six TO92 footprints with all possible modifications of E, C and B 
are really an improvised band-aid to make symbolic pin "numbers" work 
within the current framework.

---<)kaimartin(>--- 

- Raw text -